Page 1 of 1

joint pretrial stipulation

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:13 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Attached is a sample that some may find useful.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Larry Webb wrote:
> **
>
>
> All the examples I have found are Pleading type documents.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Best regards****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Larry Webb****
>
> State Bar of California 229344****
>
> Central District California****
>
> "A Debt Relief Agency"****
>
> Check out my Blog ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Larry@webbklaw. com****
>
> Law Offices of Larry Webb****
>
> 484 Mobil Ste 43****
>
> Camarillo Ca 93010****
>
> ** **
>
> P 805.987.1400****
>
> F 805.987.2866****
>
> C 805.750.2150****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Friday, September 06, 2013 3:51 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] joint pretrial stipulation****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> I have been unable to find a form Joint Pretrial Stipulation on the
> Court's website.
> Is this something that is generally written from scratch?****
>
> Thanks,
> ****
>
>
> -- ****
>
> Kirk Brennan****
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Attached is a sample that some may find useful.On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Larry Webb <larry@webbklaw.com> wrote:
All the examples I have found are Pleading type documents.
Best regards

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

joint pretrial stipulation

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:18 am
by Yahoo Bot

All the examples I have found are Pleading type documents.
Best regards
Larry Webb
State Bar of California 229344
Central District California
"A Debt Relief Agency"
Check out my Blog
Larry@webbklaw. com
Law Offices of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ste 43
Camarillo Ca 93010
P 805.987.1400
F 805.987.2866
C 805.750.2150

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

joint pretrial stipulation

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:50 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Check the rules. 9016 I think. The content required is right below the rule on status conference.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
> I have been unable to find a form Joint Pretrial Stipulation on the Court's website.
> Is this something that is generally written from scratch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

joint pretrial stipulation

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:51 pm
by Yahoo Bot

I have been unable to find a form Joint Pretrial Stipulation on the Court's
website.
Is this something that is generally written from scratch?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
I have been unable to find a form Joint Pretrial Stipulation on the Court's website. Is this something that is generally written from scratch?Thanks,Kirk BrennanCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.