Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Thank you. That's what I figured. Since the posting of this, now the last creditor sent me a fax that he plans on filing (and he sent me a copy of the response)unless My client works out something with him.
Sent from my iPhone: Nathan Berneman
On Sep 8, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
> Of the creditors, I would only serve the creditor who filed the opposition to the motion.
>
> On Sep 8, 2013 1:11 AM, "Nathan Berneman" wrote:
>>
>> The Local Rules say that the Moving party must set a hearing date if a Response is filed and serve the party that responded and the US Trustee. I filed a Motion to Avoid about 12 judgment liens (about 35 creditors, attorneys, agents for service of process and Officers), and 1 of them just filed a Response claiming that they believe value of the property is higher.
>>
>> Since I only have to serve the Notice of hearing date on the creditor that filed the Response, is it better to serve all the creditors I listed in the Motion?
>>
>> If yes, and I serve all the creditors with the Notice of Hearing, I feel that the other creditors will now have more that the 14 days needed in case they now want to file a Response as well.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Nate Berneman, Esq.
>
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Of the creditors, I would only serve the creditor who filed the opposition
to the motion.
On Sep 8, 2013 1:11 AM, "Nathan Berneman" wrote:
> **
>
>
> The Local Rules say that the Moving party must set a hearing date if a
> Response is filed and serve the party that responded and the US Trustee. I
> filed a Motion to Avoid about 12 judgment liens (about 35 creditors,
> attorneys, agents for service of process and Officers), and 1 of them just
> filed a Response claiming that they believe value of the property is higher.
>
> Since I only have to serve the Notice of hearing date on the creditor that
> filed the Response, is it better to serve all the creditors I listed in the
> Motion?
>
> If yes, and I serve all the creditors with the Notice of Hearing, I feel
> that the other creditors will now have more that the 14 days needed in case
> they now want to file a Response as well.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Nate Berneman, Esq.
>
>
Of the creditors, I would only serve the creditor who filed the opposition to the motion.
On Sep 8, 2013 1:11 AM, "Nathan Berneman" <nathanberneman@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Local Rules say that the Moving party must set a hearing date if a Response is filed and serve the party that responded and the US Trustee. I filed a Motion to Avoid about 12 judgment liens (about 35 creditors, attorneys, agents for service of process and Officers), and 1 of them just filed a Response claiming that they believe value of the property is higher.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

The Local Rules say that the Moving party must set a hearing date if a Response is filed and serve the party that responded and the US Trustee. I filed a Motion to Avoid about 12 judgment liens (about 35 creditors, attorneys, agents for service of process and Officers), and 1 of them just filed a Response claiming that they believe value of the property is higher.
Since I only have to serve the Notice of hearing date on the creditor that filed the Response, is it better to serve all the creditors I listed in the Motion?
If yes, and I serve all the creditors with the Notice of Hearing, I feel that the other creditors will now have more that the 14 days needed in case they now want to file a Response as well.
Thank you,
Nate Berneman, Esq.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.