Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Ok. I'll ask the board to schedule it. If they won't, I'll do a webinar during the closing ceremonies.
Sent from my iPhonears
On Aug 10, 2012, at 11:11 AM, "Jeffrey S. Shinbrot" wrote:
> No no no I beg to differ, there is no 3 month period (maybe you are referring to the custom of attaching a budget for 90 days) and you cant get final use (through confirmation) on an emergency motion to use and cash collateral unless you comply with the time limitation in 4001(b)(2) (which says that a final hearing can>
>
>
> It is the same rule in both individual cases and corporate cases, the 14 days lets other creditors have enough time to see if there is anything in your motion that adversely affects them that they want to object to (like you are giving too much away to the secured creditor so you can use the cash). There is one emergency motion to use cash collateral, that hopefully gets heard in the first few days of the case, that motion seeks interim use of cash and a final hearing, if there is not a stipulation between the debtor and secured creditor which picks a proposed date for the further or final hearing, then the court sets a further hearing or final hearing if it is a final hearing it cant be less than 14 days after service of your motion. In both individual and corporate cases the length of time you get to use cash before the next hearing is (other than the 14 day rule) totally fact dependent if you are at war with your secured creditor and they say your client is stealing rents it will be short if you are all holding hands and all on the same page, it will be longer but you are not going to get a final hearing until 14 days after service of the motion.
>
>
>
> Dennis, I think you should do an everything you ever wanted to know about cash collateral MCLE -- it is really an important and complex issue and with the number individual 11s getting filed there is definitely a need.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Michael Avanesian
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:27 AM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If you look at the new (June 2012) Cash Collateral form for individuals:
>
> http://www.cacb.uscourts.gov/cacb/Court ... al%20Rules
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

No no no I beg to differ, there is no 3 month period (maybe you are referring to the custom of attaching a budget for 90 days) and you can't get "final" use (through confirmation) on an emergency motion to use and cash collateral unless you comply with the time limitation in 4001(b)(2) (which says that a "final" hearing can't take place less than 14 days after service of the motion) .
It is the same rule in both individual cases and corporate cases, the 14 days lets other creditors have enough time to see if there is anything in your motion that adversely affects them that they want to object to (like you are giving too much away to the secured creditor so you can use the cash). There is one emergency motion to use cash collateral, that hopefully gets heard in the first few days of the case, that motion seeks interim use of cash and a final hearing, if there is not a stipulation between the debtor and secured creditor which picks a proposed date for the further or final hearing, then the court sets a further hearing or final hearing - if it is a final hearing it can't be less than 14 days after service of your motion. In both individual and corporate cases the length of time you get to use cash before the next hearing is (other than the 14 day rule) totally fact dependent - if you are at war with your secured creditor and they say your client is stealing rents - it will be short - if you are all holding hands and all on the same page, it will be longer - but you are not going to get a final hearing until 14 days after service of the motion.
Dennis, I think you should do an "everything you ever wanted to know about cash collateral" MCLE -- it is really an important and complex issue and with the number individual 11s getting filed there is definitely a need.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Right, the finite period is until the next hearing, it is one motion that asks for interim use and a final hearing (no earlier than 14 days after service of the motion-- FRBP 4001(b)(2)), so you file the best emergency motion that you can (meaning budgets, proof of equity cushion), and at the emergency hearing judge either sets "final" - or in many cases, "further" hearing -- if it really was an emergency case and your evidence was not great, supplement the evidence between hearings - there is also a corresponding local rule that sets forth the do and don'ts., don't know it off the top of my head.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

If you look at the new (June 2012) Cash Collateral form for individuals:

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Thanks. But don't emergency motions generally set a finite period of time
(e.g. 2 months), whereas the final hearing would cover a longer period of
time?
On Aug 8, 2012 9:55 PM, "Jeffrey S. Shinbrot"
wrote:
> **
>
>
> So the emergency motion would get granted on an interim basis at that
> first hearing, court sets final hearing on the same motion (usu final
> hearing date is in the order granting interim use) since there is a final
> hearing on the same motion, there is not a second motion filed, but lot of
> times you supplement the motion with additional evidence like budgets and
> evidence of value of collateral, also most of these motions settle with a
> stip (budget gets negotiated, adequate protectection payments get
> negotiated etc.).
>
> Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esquire
> THE SHINBROT FIRM
> 8200 Wilshire Boulevard
> Suite 400
> Beverly Hills, California 90211
> Phone: (310) 659-5444
> jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com
> This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged.
> Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee)
> you may not use, copy or disclose this message or any information contained
> in or attached to this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender and delete or destroy the message and any copies
> of it. Circular 230 Disclosure. United States Treasury regulations
> effective June 21, 2005 require us to notify you that to the extent that
> this communication, or any of its attachments, contains or constitutes
> advice regarding any U.S. Federal tax issue, such advice is not intended or
> written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of
> avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
> If you are not the original addressee of this communication, and if any tax
> advice in the communication or any of its attachments is being used to
> promote, market, or recommend any transaction or investment to you, the
> Treasury regulations require us to notify you that (1) the advice was
> written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction or
> investment, and (2) you should seek advice from an independent tax advisor
> regarding the transaction or investment based on your particular
> circumstances.
>
>
> *From*: Kirk Brennan [mailto:kirkinhermosa@gmail.com]
> *Sent*: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 09:43 PM
> *To*: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject*: Re: [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order
>
> When an emergency motion for use of cash collateral is filed and granted
> which states a limited period of time (e.g. 2 months) for use of cash
> collateral, is a separate (non-emergency) motion for use of cash collateral
> generally filed to cover the case until plan confirmation or conversion?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey S. Shinbrot jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Right, I like to have it uploaded and take the LOU doc number with me.
>>
>> Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esquire
>> THE SHINBROT FIRM
>> 8200 Wilshire Boulevard
>> Suite 400
>> Beverly Hills, California 90211
>> Phone: (310) 659-5444
>> jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com
>> This message contains information that may be confidential and
>> privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the
>> addressee) you may not use, copy or disclose this message or any
>> information contained in or attached to this message. If you have received
>> this message in error, please advise the sender and delete or destroy the
>> message and any copies of it. Circular 230 Disclosure. United States
>> Treasury regulations effective June 21, 2005 require us to notify you that
>> to the extent that this communication, or any of its attachments, contains
>> or constitutes advice regarding any U.S. Federal tax issue, such advice is
>> not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for
>> the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal
>> Revenue Service. If you are not the original addressee of this
>> communication, and if any tax advice in the communication or any of its
>> attachments is being used to promote, market, or recommend any transaction
>> or investment to you, the Treasury regulations require us to notify you
>> that (1) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of
>> the transaction or investment, and (2) you should seek advice from an
>> independent tax advisor regarding the transaction or investment based on
>> your particular circumstances.
>>
>>
>> *From*: Jeffrey S. Shinbrot [mailto:jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com]
>> *Sent*: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 02:12 PM
>> *To*: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>> *Subject*: Re: [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order
>>
>> I do same as Joe, esp if 1st day motion, some judges will call the LOU
>> order up from the bench at the hearing and change and sign.
>>
>> Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esquire
>> THE SHINBROT FIRM
>> 8200 Wilshire Boulevard
>> Suite 400
>> Beverly Hills, California 90211
>> Phone: (310) 659-5444
>> jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com
>> This message contains information that may be confidential and
>> privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the
>> addressee) you may not use, copy or disclose this message or any
>> information contained in or attached to this message. If you have received
>> this message in error, please advise the sender and delete or destroy the
>> message and any copies of it. Circular 230 Disclosure. United States
>> Treasury regulations effective June 21, 2005 require us to notify you that
>> to the extent that this communication, or any of its attachments, contains
>> or constitutes advice regarding any U.S. Federal tax issue, such advice is
>> not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for
>> the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal
>> Revenue Service. If you are not the original addressee of this
>> communication, and if any tax advice in the communication or any of its
>> attachments is being used to promote, market, or recommend any transaction
>> or investment to you, the Treasury regulations require us to notify you
>> that (1) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of
>> the transaction or investment, and (2) you should seek advice from an
>> independent tax advisor regarding the transaction or investment based on
>> your particular circumstances.
>>
>>
>> *From*: Joseph E. Caceres [mailto:JEC@locs.com]
>> *Sent*: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 01:57 PM
>> *To*: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>> *Subject*: RE: [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order
>>
>>
>> I usually attach the proposed order as an exhibit to the motion and lodge
>> an order later after the court makes whatever ruling it makes.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Joseph E. Caceres, Esq.
>> Caceres & Shamash, LLP
>> 8200 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400
>> Beverly Hills, CA 90211
>> Tel: (310) 205-3400
>> Fax: (310) 878-8308
>> E-mail: jec@locs.com****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Kirk Brennan
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:26 PM
>> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
>> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Is the proposed form of order that accompanies a motion to use cash
>> collateral attached to the motion itself? or lodged using LOU? or
>> otherwise?
>> FRBP 4001(b)(1)(A) does not specify.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>> California Law Offi ce, P.C.
>> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
>> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
>> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
>> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
>> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
>> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
>> message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
>> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
>> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
>> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
>> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
>> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>>
>> ****
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5186 - Release Date: 08/08/12
>> ****
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
Thanks. But don't emergency motions generally set a finite period of time (e.g. 2 months), whereas the final hearing would cover a longer period of time?
On Aug 8, 2012 9:55 PM, "Jeffrey S. Shinbrot" <jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com> wrote:
So the emergency motion would get granted on an interim basis at that first hearing, court sets final hearing on the same motion (usu final hearing date is in the order granting interim use) since there is a final hearing on the same motion, there is not a second motion filed, but lot of times you supplement the motion with additional evidence like budgets and evidence of value of collateral, also most of these motions settle with a stip (budget gets negotiated, adequate protectection payments get negotiated etc.).
Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esquire
THE SHINBROT FIRM
8200 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 400
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Phone: (310) 659-5444
jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com
This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee) you may not use, copy or disclose this message or any information contained in or attached to this message. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender and delete or destroy the message and any copies of it. Circular 230 Disclosure. United States Treasury regulations effective June 21, 2005 require us to notify you that to the extent that this communication, or any of its attachments, contains or constitutes advice regarding any U.S. Federal tax issue, such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. If you are not the original addressee of this communication, and if any tax advice in the communication or any of its attachments is being used to promote, market, or recommend any transaction or investment to you, the Treasury regulations require us to notify you that (1) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction or investment, and (2) you should seek advice from an independent tax advisor regarding the transaction or investment based on your particular circumstances.
From: Kirk Brennan [mailto:kirkinhermosa@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 09:43 PMTo:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

When an emergency motion for use of cash collateral is filed and granted
which states a limited period of time (e.g. 2 months) for use of cash
collateral, is a separate (non-emergency) motion for use of cash collateral
generally filed to cover the case until plan confirmation or conversion?
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey S. Shinbrot wrote:
> **
>
>
> Right, I like to have it uploaded and take the LOU doc number with me.
>
> Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esquire
> THE SHINBROT FIRM
> 8200 Wilshire Boulevard
> Suite 400
> Beverly Hills, California 90211
> Phone: (310) 659-5444
> jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com
> This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged.
> Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee)
> you may not use, copy or disclose this message or any information contained
> in or attached to this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender and delete or destroy the message and any copies
> of it. Circular 230 Disclosure. United States Treasury regulations
> effective June 21, 2005 require us to notify you that to the extent that
> this communication, or any of its attachments, contains or constitutes
> advice regarding any U.S. Federal tax issue, such advice is not intended or
> written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of
> avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
> If you are not the original addressee of this communication, and if any tax
> advice in the communication or any of its attachments is being used to
> promote, market, or recommend any transaction or investment to you, the
> Treasury regulations require us to notify you that (1) the advice was
> written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction or
> investment, and (2) you should seek advice from an independent tax advisor
> regarding the transaction or investment based on your particular
> circumstances.
>
>
> *From*: Jeffrey S. Shinbrot [mailto:jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com]
> *Sent*: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 02:12 PM
> *To*: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject*: Re: [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order
>
> I do same as Joe, esp if 1st day motion, some judges will call the LOU
> order up from the bench at the hearing and change and sign.
>
> Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esquire
> THE SHINBROT FIRM
> 8200 Wilshire Boulevard
> Suite 400
> Beverly Hills, California 90211
> Phone: (310) 659-5444
> jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com
> This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged.
> Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee)
> you may not use, copy or disclose this message or any information contained
> in or attached to this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender and delete or destroy the message and any copies
> of it. Circular 230 Disclosure. United States Treasury regulations
> effective June 21, 2005 require us to notify you that to the extent that
> this communication, or any of its attachments, contains or constitutes
> advice regarding any U.S. Federal tax issue, such advice is not intended or
> written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of
> avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
> If you are not the original addressee of this communication, and if any tax
> advice in the communication or any of its attachments is being used to
> promote, market, or recommend any transaction or investment to you, the
> Treasury regulations require us to notify you that (1) the advice was
> written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction or
> investment, and (2) you should seek advice from an independent tax advisor
> regarding the transaction or investment based on your particular
> circumstances.
>
>
> *From*: Joseph E. Caceres [mailto:JEC@locs.com]
> *Sent*: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 01:57 PM
> *To*: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject*: RE: [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order
>
>
> I usually attach the proposed order as an exhibit to the motion and lodge
> an order later after the court makes whatever ruling it makes.****
>
> ** **
>
> Joseph E. Caceres, Esq.
> Caceres & Shamash, LLP
> 8200 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400
> Beverly Hills, CA 90211
> Tel: (310) 205-3400
> Fax: (310) 878-8308
> E-mail: jec@locs.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:26 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] motion to use cash collateral- proposed order****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Is the proposed form of order that accompanies a motion to use cash
> collateral attached to the motion itself? or lodged using LOU? or
> otherwise?
> FRBP 4001(b)(1)(A) does not specify.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Offi ce, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5186 - Release Date: 08/08/12*
> ***
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
When an emergency motion for use of cash collateral is filed and granted
which states a limited period of time (e.g. 2 months) for use of cash
collateral, is a separate (non-emergency) motion for use of cash
collateral generally filed to cover the case until plan confirmation or
conversion?On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey S. Shinbrot <jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com> wrote:
Right, I like to have it uploaded and take the LOU doc number with me.
Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, Esquire
THE SHINBROT FIRM
8200 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 400
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Phone: (310) 659-5444
jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com
This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee) you may not use, copy or disclose this message or any information contained in or attached to this message. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender and delete or destroy the message and any copies of it. Circular 230 Disclosure. United States Treasury regulations effective June 21, 2005 require us to notify you that to the extent that this communication, or any of its attachments, contains or constitutes advice regarding any U.S. Federal tax issue, such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. If you are not the original addressee of this communication, and if any tax advice in the communication or any of its attachments is being used to promote, market, or recommend any transaction or investment to you, the Treasury regulations require us to notify you that (1) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction or investment, and (2) you should seek advice from an independent tax advisor regarding the transaction or investment based on your particular circumstances.
From: Jeffrey S. Shinbrot [mailto:jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 02:12 PMTo:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I usually attach the proposed order as an exhibit to the motion and lodge an order later after the court makes whatever ruling it makes.
Joseph E. Caceres, Esq.
Caceres & Shamash, LLP
8200 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel: (310) 205-3400
Fax: (310) 878-8308
E-mail: jec@locs.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Is the proposed form of order that accompanies a motion to use cash
collateral attached to the motion itself? or lodged using LOU? or
otherwise?
FRBP 4001(b)(1)(A) does not specify.
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Is the proposed form of order that accompanies a motion to use cash collateral attached to the motion itself? or lodged using LOU? or otherwise?FRBP 4001(b)(1)(A) does not specify.Thanks,--
Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.