Page 1 of 1

Collecting your fees postpetition

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:39 pm
by Yahoo Bot

ah. Obviously not cool (or allowable).
Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
Telephone: (818) 226-1205
Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY
BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW,DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY.
THANK YOU.
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, August 19, 2012 4:00:26 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Re: Collecting your fees postpetition
Look up Judge Carlson northern district of cal. The atty bugged the client flor
payment and mislead the client re the consequences of not paying him.
wrote:
>
> Hi John-
>
> I do not have access to the case you cited. Could you please print it (or give
>
> a link to it)? I'd like to see what the attorney did, aside from receiving
> money postpetition, to warrant the result in the case.
>
> Thank you
> Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
> LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
> 21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
> Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
> Telephone: (818) 226-1205
> Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
>
>
>
>
> THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
> CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY
> BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND
> CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR
>AN
>
> AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
>
> NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW,
> DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
> IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY.
>
> THANK YOU.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sun, August 19, 2012 11:58:44 AM
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Collecting your fees postpetition
>
>
> In re Castillo, 2011 WL 1638164 (Bkrtcy N.D. CA April, 2011, Carlson J.)> Issue: Did the attempt by debtor's chapter 7 counsel to collect his fee> postpetition violate the discharge injunction? Is disgorgement of all fees the
>
> appropriate remedy?
>
>
> Holding: Yes
>
ah. Obviously not cool (or allowable). Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226Telephone: (818) 226-1205Facsimile : (818) 226-1213THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS
MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Collecting your fees postpetition

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:00 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Look up Judge Carlson northern district of cal. The atty bugged the client flor payment and mislead the client re the consequences of not paying him.
wrote:
>
> Hi John-
>
> I do not have access to the case you cited. Could you please print it (or give
> a link to it)? I'd like to see what the attorney did, aside from receiving
> money postpetition, to warrant the result in the case.
>
> Thank you
> Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
> LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
> 21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
> Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
> Telephone: (818) 226-1205
> Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
>
>
>
>
> THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
> CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY
> BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND
> CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN
> AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
> NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW,
> DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
> IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY.
> THANK YOU.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sun, August 19, 2012 11:58:44 AM
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Collecting your fees postpetition
>
>
> In re Castillo, 2011 WL 1638164 (Bkrtcy N.D. CA April, 2011, Carlson J.)> Issue: Did the attempt by debtor's chapter 7 counsel to collect his fee> postpetition violate the discharge injunction? Is disgorgement of all fees the
> appropriate remedy?
>
>
> Holding: Yes
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Collecting your fees postpetition

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:16 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Hi John-
I do not have access to the case you cited. Could you please print it (or give
a link to it)? I'd like to see what the attorney did, aside from receivingmoney postpetition, to warrant the result in the case.
Thank you
Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
Telephone: (818) 226-1205
Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY
BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW,DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY.
THANK YOU.
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, August 19, 2012 11:58:44 AM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Collecting your fees postpetition
In re Castillo, 2011 WL 1638164 (Bkrtcy N.D. CA April, 2011, Carlson J.)
Issue: Did the attempt by debtor's chapter 7 counsel to collect his fee
postpetition violate the discharge injunction? Is disgorgement of all fees the
appropriate remedy?
Holding: Yes
Hi John-I do not have access to the case you cited. Could you please print it (or give a link to it)? I'd like to see what the attorney did, aside from receiving money postpetition, to warrant the result in the case.Thank you Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226Telephone: (818) 226-1205Facsimile : (818) 226-1213THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS
MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Collecting your fees postpetition

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:58 am
by Yahoo Bot

In re Castillo, 2011 WL 1638164 (Bkrtcy N.D. CA April, 2011, Carlson J.)
Issue: Did the attempt by debtor's chapter 7 counsel to collect his fee postpetition violate the discharge injunction? Is disgorgement of all fees the appropriate remedy?
Holding: Yes

The post was migrated from Yahoo.