Judge Riblet and hearings on Disclosure Statements
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:18 am
Dennis is right. I saw Donovan go off on a young atty because he asked for second call. Admittedly Donovan seemed to be annoyed about other stuff but he said that the first thing he was mad about was that the atty asked to do the hearing by telephone which Donovan said showed that he did not realize how important the hearing was and then the second call which showed he was to busy to focus on the matter and then I think there were 80 or so problems with the disclosure statement.
>
> Kirk:
>
> Too important a hearing to send an appearance atty.
>
> d
>
>
> ________________________________
> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 9:43 PM
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Judge Riblet and hearings on Disclosure Statements
>
>
>
> Does Judge Riblet allow appearance attorneys for hearings on adequacy of Disclosure Statements?
> Or is the attorney of record required to appear?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.