Thank you Nancy Clark for your hard work on behalf of our Debtors in the
9th Circuit!
Congratulations!
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Erik Clark wrote:
> **
>
> [Attachment(s) from Erik Clark included
> below]
>
> In this case, argued by Nancy Clark on behalf of the Debtors, the 9th Cir
> Court of Appeals upholds the part of Kagenveama which states that an above
> median debtor with negative DMI does not have to file a 5-year plan. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Rod Danielsons office argued that because the Supreme Court in Lanning
> overruled Kagenveama the debtors must file a 5 year plan. The 9thCircuit Disagreed.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Needless to say, this is a victory for debtors in general and we are very
> proud of Nancy for the work she put into this successful result.****
>
> ** **
>
> M. Erik Clark
> [image: BCLogoSmall]
> 100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
> West Covina, CA 91791****
>
>
www.blclaw.com
> Office: (626) 332-8600
> Fax: (626) 332-8644
> Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
> American Board of Certification****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
*Office:*
5150 Candlewood Street, Suite 17F
Lakewood, CA 90712
*Mailing:*
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
Lakewood, CA 90712
Office: 877-631-2220
Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078
Email:
attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web:
www.attorneychristine.com
Blog:
www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
Thank you Nancy Clark for your hard work on behalf of our Debtors in the 9th Circuit!Congratulations!On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Erik Clark <
eclark@blclaw.com> wrote:
[Attachment(s) from Erik Clark included below]
In this case, argued by Nancy Clark on behalf of the Debtors, the 9th Cir Court of Appeals upholds the part of Kagenveama which states that an above median debtor with negative DMI does not have to file a 5-year plan.
Rod Danielsons office argued that because the Supreme Court in Lanning overruled Kagenveama the debtors must file a 5 year plan. The 9th Circuit Disagreed.
Needless to say, this is a victory for debtors in general and we are very proud of Nancy for the work she put into this successful result.
M. Erik Clark
The post was migrated from Yahoo.