I'd say no.
On Sep 19, 2012 10:26 PM, "Kirk Brennan" wrote:
> **
>
>
> So would litigation qualify as a "whenever theres a legitimate business
> need."
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jay Fleischman wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Here's something I wrote a bit of time ago on permissible purpose under
>> the FCRA:
>>
>>
>>
http://www.consumerhelpcentral.com/fair ... e-purpose/
>>
>> -------------
>> Jay S. Fleischman, Esq.
>> Shaev & Fleischman, LLP
>> Smart Solutions To Bill Problems
>>
>> T: 626-808-4343 x704
>> E:
jay@sflawca.com
>>
>>
www.ConsumerHelpCentral.com
>>
>> 556 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 101-152
>> Pasadena CA 91105-2656
>>
>> Email isn't secure, so it's not confidential. By communicating with me
>> by email, you understand that it's not confidential.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
>
www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
I'd say no.
On Sep 19, 2012 10:26 PM, "Kirk Brennan" <
kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
So would litigation qualify as a "whenever theres a legitimate business need."On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jay Fleischman <
bankruptcy@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's something I wrote a bit of time ago on permissible purpose under the FCRA:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.