Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Excellent!
If you have any questions or should you need any additional assistance, I
am here to help. Have a fantastic day!
R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
OFF: (818) 734-7223
CEL: (818) 554-9922
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept notice for *Ex
Parte* Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
business hours.
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If
you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute,
store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To comply with requirements imposed by the
Department of the Treasury, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended or written by the practitioner to be used, and that it cannot be
used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (ii) supporting the
promotion or marketing of any transactions or matters addressed herein.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:48 AM, rdmlaw@ymail.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Our next program is on Saturday, February 21, 2015 -- "Litigating with
> HOAs."
>
> Please email me (roksana@srhlawfirm.com) or respond to this message re
> any questions that you would like the panel to discuss/address.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> *- Roksana D. Moradi, Esq.**
>
> * *Certified Bankruptcy Specialist, State Bar of California, Board of
> Legal Specialization*
>
> *SIMON RESNIK HAYES LLP*
> 15233 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 250
> Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
> *Direct Line:* (818) 933-2843
> *Main Line: *(818) 783-6251
> *Facsimile: (*818) 827-4919
>
>
>
Excellent!
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Hello, these are some questions I have. I am not sure whether they fall
under "litigating with HOAs" but I thought I'd throw them out there.
1. Should we be reading CC&Rs for holes or are they sufficiently uniform
that we generally cannot strip HOA liens.
2. Does the HOA lien take priority over all other liens? An example would
be property is valued at 300k, Bank lien is 200k, exemption is 75k,
judicial lien is 25k, HOA records a 30k lien. Even though HOA lien was
recorded after judicial lien, if it has higher priority then judicial lien
can be stripped. So what's the order of priority there?
3. I thought I read a case last year where the HOA obtained a money
judgment and recorded it. The recordation of the abstract of judgment made
the HOA's lien "merge" into the abstract and so it became subject to a lien
strip. Does the panel have any comments as to that? I can't find the case.
Sincerely,
*Michael Avanesian, Esq. *AVANESIAN LAW FIRM
101 N. Brand Blvd., PH 1920
Glendale, California 91203
Tel: 818.276.2477 Fax: 818.208.4550
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:48 AM, rdmlaw@ymail.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Our next program is on Saturday, February 21, 2015 -- "Litigating with
> HOAs."
>
> Please email me (roksana@srhlawfirm.com) or respond to this message re
> any questions that you would like the panel to discuss/address.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> *- Roksana D. Moradi, Esq.**
>
> * *Certified Bankruptcy Specialist, State Bar of California, Board of
> Legal Specialization*
>
> *SIMON RESNIK HAYES LLP*
> 15233 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 250
> Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
> *Direct Line:* (818) 933-2843
> *Main Line: *(818) 783-6251
> *Facsimile: (*818) 827-4919
>
>
>
Hello, these are some questions I have. I am not sure whether they fall under "litigating with HOAs" but I thought I'd throw them out there.1. Should we be reading CC&Rs for holes or are they sufficiently uniform that we generally cannot strip HOA liens.2. Does the HOA lien take priority over all other liens? An example would be property is valued at 300k, Bank lien is 200k, exemption is 75k, judicial lien is 25k, HOA records a 30k lien. Even though HOA lien was recorded after judicial lien, if it has higher priority then judicial lien can be stripped. So what's the order of priority there?3. I thought I read a case last year where the HOA obtained a money judgment and recorded it. The recordation of the abstract of judgment made the HOA's lien "merge" into the abstract and so it became subject to a lien strip. Does the panel have any comments as to that? I can't find the case.Sincerely,Michael Avanesian, Esq.AVANESIAN
LAW FIRM101
N. Brand Blvd., PH 1920Glendale,
California 91203Tel:
818.276.2477 Fax: 818.208.4550
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:48 AM, rdmlaw@ymail.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
All,Our next program is on Saturday, February 21, 2015 -- "Litigating with HOAs."Please email me (roksana@srhlawfirm.com) or respond to this message re any questions that you would like the panel to discuss/address.Thanks.- Roksana D. Moradi, Esq.**Certified Bankruptcy Specialist, State Bar of California, Board of Legal SpecializationSIMON RESNIK HAYES LLP15233 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 250Sherman Oaks, CA 91403Direct Line:(818) 933-2843Main Line:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.