Chapter 13 Post Petition Mortgage Arrears After Discharge
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 2:54 pm
You could reopen and try an OSC re sanctions. To defend mortgage servicer
would presumably need to provide evidence of missed payments. Debtor could
then counter with evidence of payments. One way to get to the bottom of it.
On Feb 4, 2015 2:03 PM, "'Stephen Vokshori' stephen@voklaw.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
>
> No, mortgage payments made outside of the plan. This is a Valley case.
>
>
>
> *N. Stephen Vokshori* | VOKSHORI LAW GROUP | (213) 986-4323 |
> stephen@voklaw.com
>
>
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 04, 2015 1:54 PM
> *To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Chapter 13 Post Petition Mortgage Arrears After
> Discharge
>
>
>
>
>
> The mortgage payments were being paid through the plan?
>
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> *Mailing Address Only:*
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of
> Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office
> of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for
> the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
> disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is
> prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
> the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
> communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used,
> and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
> another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/4/2015 1:36 PM, 'Stephen Vokshori' stephen@voklaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
>
>
> C13 trustee filed Notice of Final Cure Payment in early 2014 and mortgage
> company filed its 3002.1(g) stating that debtor isnt current on
> post-petition mortgage payments. Following month, debtor filed cert of
> compliance and application for discharge. Trustee filed final report and in
> Nov 2014 the debtor received his discharge under 1328(a).
>
>
>
> Mortgage company is now contacting PC telling him hes behind on his
> mortgage based on missed payments during the plan. Debtor disputes that he
> missed any payments.
>
>
>
> Thoughts on the best way to resolve this?
>
>
>
> (Debtors filing attorney was suspended/made inactive last year.)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
> *N. Stephen Vokshori, Esq. *
>
> Managing Attorney
>
> 213-986-4323 x100 (direct) | 310-881-6996 (fax)
>
> stephen@voklaw.com (email) | www.VokLaw.com
> (website)
>
>
>
> VOKSHORI LAW GROUP
>
> 1010 Wilshire Boulevard | Suite 1404 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
You could reopen and try an OSC re sanctions. To defend mortgage servicer would presumably need to provide evidence of missed payments. Debtor could then counter with evidence of payments. One way to get to the bottom of it.
On Feb 4, 2015 2:03 PM, "'Stephen Vokshori' stephen@voklaw.com [cdcbaa]" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
No, mortgage payments made outside of the plan. This is a Valley case.N. Stephen Vokshori LAW
The post was migrated from Yahoo.