Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

I am wondering whether the entire matrix needs to be served on a motion to
vacate an order disallowing a claim. The order was erroneously entered, an
amended claim having been filed that cured the defects of the original
claim. My thinking if the order is vacated, other creditors are affected
and so the entire matrix must be served. This is a $2,000 claim, not worth
the postage but I think I probably have to serve everyone. What say you?
Holly Roark
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
*and Sports Lawyer*
holly@roarklawoffices.com **primary email address**
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California - Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600; F (310) 553-2601
*By State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
**Counsel for Chapter 13 Trustee Kathleen A. McCallister (Idaho) T (208)
922-5100
I am wondering whether the entire matrix needs to be served on a motion to vacate an order disallowing a claim. The order was erroneously entered, an amended claim having been filed that cured the defects of the original claim. My thinking if the order is vacated, other creditors are affected and so the entire matrix must be served. This is a $2,000 claim, not worth the postage but I think I probably have to serve everyone. What say you? Holly RoarkCertified Bankruptcy Specialist*
holly@roarklawoffices.com**primary email address**
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California - Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600; F (310) 553-2601
The post was migrated from Yahoo.