IRS debts in ch 11
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:08 pm
charset="ISO-8859-1"
If you can get the IRS to agree to a payoff of longer than five years, you
need to increase your hourly rate, whatever it is.
John D. Faucher
Hurlbett & Faucher, LLP
Disclosure Under U.S. IRS Circular 230: The recipient may not use any tax
advice contained in this communication, including any attachments, for the
purpose of avoiding federal tax related penalties or promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any particular transaction or matter.
On 1/14/12 11:35 AM, "P L" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> holder of claim can agree to longer than 5 years. 1129(a)(9)
>
> Peter M. Lively, JD, MBA
> The Personal Financial Law Center
> A-Bankruptcy-Attorney.com
> Culver City (310) 391-2400
>
>
>
>
>
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 7:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] IRS debts in ch 11
>
>
>
>
> Yes, within 5 years of the date of assessment (don't have my code handy at
> the moment)
>
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this means at
> http://bklaw.com/bankruptcy-blog/2008/0 ... efinition/)
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of
> Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use
> of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure,
> copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
> the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
> communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used,
> and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
> party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
> On 1/13/2012 7:19 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>> Do IRS debts have to be pain in full through a ch 11 plan as they do in ch
>> 13?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>> California Law Office, P.C.
>> calibankrutpcysite.com
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
>> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance
>> on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us
>> immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its
>> attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or
>> work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
>> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be
>> used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
>> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
>> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
>> letters containing the signature of a director.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
charset="ISO-8859-1"
If you can get the IRS to agree to a payoff of longer than five years, you need to increase your hourly rate, whatever it is. John D. FaucherHurlbett & Faucher, LLPDisclosure Under U.S. IRS Circular 230: The recipient may not use any tax advice contained in this communication, including any attachments, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any particular transaction or matter.On 1/14/12 11:35 AM, "P L" <
The post was migrated from Yahoo.