Motion to reopen for failure to file Debtor
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:27 pm
You didn't include Notice (e.g. scream or die notice)?
I think notice is required with every motion per the local rules. Whether
it's enforced or not is another matter.
On Oct 4, 2012 10:49 AM, "losfelizmike" wrote:
> **
>
>
> Last time this happened to me (more than 2 years ago), I did not have to
> schedule a hearing. As I recall, the clerk told me that if the judge wanted
> to see me, then they would schedule a hearing.
>
> --- In cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com, "Stella Havkin" wrote:
> >
> > Scream or die.
> >
> >
> >
> Of
> > Kirk Brennan
> > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 3:27 PM
> > To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Motion to reopen for failure to file Debtor
> Education
> > certificate
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Is "scream or die" Notice sufficient for a motion to reopen? Or must it
> be
> > set for hearing?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Kirk Brennan
> > wrote:
> >
> > Do you all normally attach a Memo of Points and Authorities to the Form
> > Motion to Reopen (Form 5010-1.1M) or is the Form Motion usually
> sufficient
> > in a run of the mill case where Debtor didn't do what they were supposed
> to?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Stella Havkin
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > No.
> >
> >
> >
> Of
> > Kirk Brennan
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:53 AM
> >
> >
> > To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Motion to reopen for failure to file Debtor
> Education
> > certificate
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Does the Motion to Reopen need to be served on all creditors?
> >
> >
> > LBR 5010-1 doesn't seem to require it.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Grennier Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Same for Ventura and Santa Barbara cases.
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael Grennier
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Kirk Brennan
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Are Motions to Reopen Case for failure to file the postpetition
> certificate
> > routinely granted? Or do judges require a showing of excusable neglect or
> > some such?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Kirk Brennan, esq.
> > California Law Office, P.C.
> > www.calibankruptcysite.com
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> > exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> > reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please
> > notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message
> and
> > its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client
> > or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> > TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> > constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may
> not
> > be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for
> the
> > purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> > Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> > letters containing the signature of a director.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Grennier Law, PC
> >
> > 5851 Thille Street, Suite 103
> >
> > Ventura, CA 93003
> >
> > (805) 643-3900
> >
> > (805) 830-0467 - Fax
> > grennierlaw.com
> >
> > #1 Bankruptcy Filing Attorney in Ventura Co
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended
> only
> > for the use of the Individual (s) named above. If you are not the
> intended
> > recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for
> > delivering this to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any
> > dissemination or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> > received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by telephone
> at
> > (805) 643-3900 or notify us by e-mail
> > at: grennierlaw@...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kirk Brennan, esq.
> > California Law Office, P.C.
> > www.calibankruptcysite.com
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> > exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> > reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please
> > notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message
> and
> > its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client
> > or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> > TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> > constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may
> not
> > be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for
> the
> > purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> > Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> > letters containing the signature of a director.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kirk Brennan, esq.
> > California Law Office, P.C.
> > www.calibankruptcysite.com
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> > exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> > reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please
> > notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message
> and
> > its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client
> > or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> > TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> > constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may
> not
> > be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for
> the
> > purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> > Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> > letters containing the signature of a director.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kirk Brennan, esq.
> > California Law Office, P.C.
> > www.calibankruptcysite.com
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> > exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> > reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please
> > notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message
> and
> > its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client
> > or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> > TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> > constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may
> not
> > be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for
> the
> > purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> > Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> > letters containing the signature of a director.
> >
>
>
>
You didn't include Notice (e.g. scream or die notice)?
I think notice is required with every motion per the local rules. Whether it's enforced or not is another matter.
On Oct 4, 2012 10:49 AM, "losfelizmike" <losfelizmike@yahoo.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.