.jpg)
Digest Number 3109
Can anyone point me to the local rule or code section concerning the requirement to extend the stay in a Chapter 13 when a second filing occurs within 12 months.
I want to verify if it is based upon date of filing or dismissal date.
Thanks in advance!
Jonathan Leventhal, esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not represent you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.
From gm@mcesq.com Mon Oct 29 14:13:20 2012
Return-Path:
X-Sender: gm@mcesq.com
X-Apparently-To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 87831 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2012 21:13:19 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (98.137.35.161)
by m3.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Oct 2012 21:13:19 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mcesq.com) (199.238.130.55)
by mta5.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2012 21:13:18 -0000
X-Received: (qmail 22855 invoked by uid 1042); 29 Oct 2012 21:13:16 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO gmcnallycomp) ([69.225.128.132])
(envelope-sender )
by 199.238.130.55 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for ; 29 Oct 2012 21:13:16 -0000
Return-Receipt-To: "Gerald McNally"
To:
References:
In-Reply-To:
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:13:21 -0700
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac20++qjTvm6QvmnR4mO72ef4c83cwBHeuAA
Disposition-Notification-To: "Gerald McNally"
X-Originating-IP: 199.238.130.55
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:6:0:0:0
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Digest Number 3109
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u8144794; yHlBe4CTQt0s046yRx8FI6-6dDO9WDoEuOnvkEjGIfpBg
Appears there are US Attorney prosecution guidelines.
My experience is with one case. Doctor owed $330k, $250k of which was payroll taxes for a manufacturing business unrelated to his medical practice. Three factors I believe were relevant: (1) payroll tax was of the debt; (2) he was somewhat of a tax protester and (3) he was a doctor.
Gerry
McNally Bus Card Smaller
Gerald McNally
McNally & Associates, P.C.
517 East Wilson Ave., Ste 104
Glendale, CA 91206
818.507.5100
Fax: 818.507.5001
Notice to Recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this email in error, and review, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message and any and all duplicates of this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.