Again, why not use the noteholder of record?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Mark T. Jessee wrote:
> If you have not done so arleady you could also call Deutsche Bank
> headquarters and ask for a service address or at least telephone number for
> Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.
>
>
> Mark T. Jessee
> Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
> "A Debt Relief Agency"
> 50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
> Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
> (805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
>
> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT
> OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED TO BE PRIVILEGED BY
> LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION,
> DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE
> NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS
> MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:32:51 -0000, "J." wrote:
>
> ******
>
> Kirk: Yes, this too has been done and the information in the County
> Recorder's Office shows OWNIT as the Noteholder. OWNIT filed for Chapter 11
> relief in 2006 and they have taken the position that the Note was sold but
> there is no assignment that has been recorded. Thanks for the suggestion.
> Simon.
>
> --- In
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com ,
> Kirk Brennan wrote:
> >
> > You could pull the DOT documents from the county recorders office. Then
> go
> > by whoever is on the record.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:22 AM, J. wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > Keith: Thanks. I have of course done all three. FDIC has information
> for
> > > Deutche Bank but not the full name that I have been given by the
> Servicer
> > > and Secretary of State has no information. Google is not helpful and
> > > certainly not for getting address for service of process. Is this a
> common
> > > problem for others? I ususally get the information from the proof of
> claim
> > > so have no issue but in this case no POC has been filed. It would seem
> that
> > > a 2004 is necessary but it seems hard to believe that this is the
> course of
> > > action that I have to take. Anyway, I am venting but if anyone has any
> > > suggestions, it would be appreciated. Simon.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com ,
> higginbothamlaw@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1. FDIC website.
> > > > 2. Secretary of State website (for California)
> > > > 3. and then do a Google search.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > KEITH HIGGINBOTHAM
> > > > 2012 cdcbaa President
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > To: cdcbaa >
> > > > Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2012 4:55 am
> > > > Subject: [cdcbaa] Address for Note Holder
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am moving to strip the lien where I only know the servicer's
> > > information. They (the sevicer) have told me that the holder is
> Deutsche
> > > Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee but they are
> unwilling to
> > > provide any further information. The MERS website does not provide any
> > > further information either. Does anyone know (short of a 2004
> examination)
> > > how to get the information (Address for Service of Process)? Thank you
> in
> > > advance. Simon.
> > > >
> > > > Simon J. Dunstan
> > > > HUGHES & DUNSTAN, LLP
> > > > Suite 1960
> > > > 21650 Oxnard Street
> > > > Woodland Hills, California 91367
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kirk Brennan, esq.
> > California Law Office, P.C.
> > calibankrutpcysite.com
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> > exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> > the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> > reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> > please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> > message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> > attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> > message.
> > TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> > constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may
> not
> > be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for
> the
> > purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> > Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> > letters containing the signature of a director.
> >
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Again, why not use the noteholder of record? On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Mark T. Jessee <
mjessee@jesseelaw.com> wrote:
If you have not done so arleady you
could also call Deutsche Bank headquarters and ask for a service addressor
at least telephone number for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.
Mark T. JesseeLaw Offices of Mark T. Jessee"A Debt Relief
Agency"50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360(805)
497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS
MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND THIS
COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED TO BE PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL
IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS
E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY
RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN
ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:32:51 -0000, "J."
<
pleabargain@msn.com> wrote:
Kirk: Yes, this too has been done and the information in the County
Recorder's Office shows OWNIT as the Noteholder. OWNIT filed for Chapter 11
relief in 2006 and they have taken the position that the Note was sold but there
is no assignment that has been recorded. Thanks for the suggestion.
Simon.--- In
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com,
Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@...> wrote:>> You could pull the
DOT documents from the county recorders office. Then go> by whoever is on
the record.> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:22 AM, J.
<pleabargain@...> wrote:> > > **> >>
>> > Keith: Thanks. I have of course done all three. FDIC has
information for> > Deutche Bank but not the full name that I have been
given by the Servicer> > and Secretary of State has no information.
Google is not helpful and> > certainly not for getting address for
service of process. Is this a common> > problem for others? I ususally
get the information from the proof of claim> > so have no issue but in
this case no POC has been filed. It would seem that> > a 2004 is
necessary but it seems hard to believe that this is the course of> >
action that I have to take. Anyway, I am venting but if anyone has any>
> suggestions, it would be appreciated. Simon.> >>
>> > --- In
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com,
higginbothamlaw@ wrote:> > >> > > 1. FDIC
website.> > > 2. Secretary of State website (for
California)> > > 3. and then do a Google search.> >
>> > >> > >> > > KEITH
HIGGINBOTHAM> > > 2012 cdcbaa President> > >>
> >> > >> > >> > >> >
.
<pleabargain@>> > > To: cdcbaa <
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>>
> > Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2012 4:55 am> > > Subject: [cdcbaa]
Address for Note Holder> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > > I am moving to strip
the lien where I only know the servicer's> > information. They (the
sevicer) have told me that the holder is Deutsche> > Bank National
Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee but they are unwilling to> >
provide any further information. The MERS website does not provide any>
> further information either. Does anyone know (short of a 2004
examination)> > how to get the information (Address for Service of
Process)? Thank you in> > advance. Simon.> > >>
> > Simon J. Dunstan> > > HUGHES & DUNSTAN, LLP>
> > Suite 1960> > > 21650 Oxnard Street> > >
Woodland Hills, California 91367> > >> >> >
> >> > > > -- > Kirk Brennan,
esq.> California Law Office, P.C.> calibankrutpcysite.com>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for
the> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are
not> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take
action in> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in
error,> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete
this> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not
waive> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of
this> message.> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained
in this e-mail does not> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in
IRS Circular 230 and may not> be used to establish reasonable reliance on
the opinion of counsel for the> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed
by Section 6662A of the Internal> Revenue Code. The firm provides
reliance opinions only in formal opinion> letters containing the
signature of a director.>
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.