9th Circuit Ruling re Kangenveama and Lanning
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:51 pm
Just to refresh your memory, we posted this news when it happen (9/10/12). Since then the tee has petitioned for an en banc rehearing. We are still waiting to hear from the 9th re: the en banc rehearing. I will let you know the result of the petition for re-hearing once we receive it. I do not believe they petitioned for a stay pending consideration of the rehearing. Therefore, it is binding on our bk judges (please feel free to correct me if I am wrong).
Thank you,
Nancy B. Clark
Attorney at Law
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791-1600
Tel: (626) 646-2555
Fax: (626) 332-8644
www.blclaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.