Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

This and the practice of reconveying deeds of trust back to the borrower are the only things that will stop the banks from wrongfully foreclosing. California law is certainly ineffective unless you can tender the entire amount owed on the mortgage.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:24 AM, R Grace Rodriguez wrote:
> FYI: The number of groups doing it is E X P A N D I N G. sad to say.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, jbsesq1965 wrote:
>
> Group:
>
> On the subject of Hijacking. I am seeing some similarities in the bogus grant deeds that are the crux of the "hijacking" cases that have occurred in my office. It leads me to believe that the perpetrator(s) are possibly a small group of people. Someone out there who is offering to stall foreclosures for a fee, and using this method.
>
> I'm going to bring examples of the bogus transfer deeds from my hijacked files to the meeting Saturday. I would like it if some of you would bring examples from your files of deeds purporting to transfer property to your client(s) that are bogus. I would like to invite anyone interested to meet with me after the program at 1:15p.m. or so to compare the offending deeds for a few minutes of collective forensic detective work.
>
> We may be able to determine, I think, whether there are just a few people out there doing this hijacking, or if its more widespread, by comparing the evidence that is showing up in our cases. We may also be able to come up with some method of assisting the OUST or FBI in back tracking these things to their sources, so someone can start putting an end to it.
>
> I'm bringing the real deed as it appears in the County Recorder's records, (available from any title officer) as well as the bogus deed that was provided to the forclosure company/lender to stop the sale that ended up in the MFR. I encourage you who have had this experience to do the same, and make an extra 30 minutes to meet Saturday.
>
> Jeff Smith
>
>
>
>
> --
> R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
> OFF: (818) 734-7223
> CEL: (818) 554-9922
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute, store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
>
This and the practice of reconveying deeds of trust back to the borrower are the only things that will stop the banks from wrongfully foreclosing. California law is certainly ineffective unless you can tender the entire amount owed on the mortgage. Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 18, 2012, at 11:24 AM, R Grace Rodriguez <rgracelaw@gmail.com> wrote:

FYI: The number of groups doing it is E X P A N D I N G. sad to say.On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, jbsesq1965 <jsmith@cgsattys.com> wrote:

Group:
On the subject of Hijacking. I am seeing some similarities in the bogus grant deeds that are the crux of the "hijacking" cases that have occurred in my office. It leads me to believe that the perpetrator(s) are possibly a small group of people. Someone out there who is offering to stall foreclosures for a fee, and using this method.
I'm going to bring examples of the bogus transfer deeds from my hijacked files to the meeting Saturday. I would like it if some of you would bring examples from your files of deeds purporting to transfer property to your client(s) that are bogus. I would like to invite anyone interested to meet with me after the program at 1:15p.m. or so to compare the offending deeds for a few minutes of collective forensic detective work.
We may be able to determine, I think, whether there are just a few people out there doing this hijacking, or if its more widespread, by comparing the evidence that is showing up in our cases. We may also be able to come up with some method of assisting the OUST or FBI in back tracking these things to their sources, so someone can start putting an end to it.
I'm bringing the real deed as it appears in the County Recorder's records, (available from any title officer) as well as the bogus deed that was provided to the forclosure company/lender to stop the sale that ended up in the MFR. I encourage you who have had this experience to do the same, and make an extra 30 minutes to meet Saturday.
Jeff Smith
-- R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.OFF: (818) 734-7223CEL: (818) 554-9922NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute, store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

FYI: The number of groups doing it is E X P A N D I N G. sad to say.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, jbsesq1965 wrote:
> **
>
>
> Group:
>
> On the subject of Hijacking. I am seeing some similarities in the bogus
> grant deeds that are the crux of the "hijacking" cases that have occurred
> in my office. It leads me to believe that the perpetrator(s) are possibly a
> small group of people. Someone out there who is offering to stall
> foreclosures for a fee, and using this method.
>
> I'm going to bring examples of the bogus transfer deeds from my hijacked
> files to the meeting Saturday. I would like it if some of you would bring
> examples from your files of deeds purporting to transfer property to your
> client(s) that are bogus. I would like to invite anyone interested to meet
> with me after the program at 1:15p.m. or so to compare the offending deeds
> for a few minutes of collective forensic detective work.
>
> We may be able to determine, I think, whether there are just a few people
> out there doing this hijacking, or if its more widespread, by comparing the
> evidence that is showing up in our cases. We may also be able to come up
> with some method of assisting the OUST or FBI in back tracking these things
> to their sources, so someone can start putting an end to it.
>
> I'm bringing the real deed as it appears in the County Recorder's records,
> (available from any title officer) as well as the bogus deed that was
> provided to the forclosure company/lender to stop the sale that ended up in
> the MFR. I encourage you who have had this experience to do the same, and
> make an extra 30 minutes to meet Saturday.
>
> Jeff Smith
>
>
>
R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
OFF: (818) 734-7223
CEL: (818) 554-9922
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
business hours.
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If
you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute,
store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
FYI: The number of groups doing it is E X P A N D I N G. sad to say.On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, jbsesq1965 <jsmith@cgsattys.com> wrote:
Group:
On the subject of Hijacking. I am seeing some similarities in the bogus grant deeds that are the crux of the "hijacking" cases that have occurred in my office. It leads me to believe that the perpetrator(s) are possibly a small group of people. Someone out there who is offering to stall foreclosures for a fee, and using this method.
I'm going to bring examples of the bogus transfer deeds from my hijacked files to the meeting Saturday. I would like it if some of you would bring examples from your files of deeds purporting to transfer property to your client(s) that are bogus. I would like to invite anyone interested to meet with me after the program at 1:15p.m. or so to compare the offending deeds for a few minutes of collective forensic detective work.
We may be able to determine, I think, whether there are just a few people out there doing this hijacking, or if its more widespread, by comparing the evidence that is showing up in our cases. We may also be able to come up with some method of assisting the OUST or FBI in back tracking these things to their sources, so someone can start putting an end to it.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Hi Jeff:
While I don't have the resources, Judge Tighe did give me an order to
subpoena video camera records from the Staples in Irvine where the
individual who went to that store to FAX to the Foreclosure Trustee the
offending Grant Deed in my case. Maybe a news story from FOX about what is
being perpetrated on the public and all the misery that comes for it would
help to educate the public about this crime. We can compare notes!
Renay
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, jbsesq1965 wrote:
> **
>
>
> Group:
>
> On the subject of Hijacking. I am seeing some similarities in the bogus
> grant deeds that are the crux of the "hijacking" cases that have occurred
> in my office. It leads me to believe that the perpetrator(s) are possibly a
> small group of people. Someone out there who is offering to stall
> foreclosures for a fee, and using this method.
>
> I'm going to bring examples of the bogus transfer deeds from my hijacked
> files to the meeting Saturday. I would like it if some of you would bring
> examples from your files of deeds purporting to transfer property to your
> client(s) that are bogus. I would like to invite anyone interested to meet
> with me after the program at 1:15p.m. or so to compare the offending deeds
> for a few minutes of collective forensic detective work.
>
> We may be able to determine, I think, whether there are just a few people
> out there doing this hijacking, or if its more widespread, by comparing the
> evidence that is showing up in our cases. We may also be able to come up
> with some method of assisting the OUST or FBI in back tracking these things
> to their sources, so someone can start putting an end to it.
>
> I'm bringing the real deed as it appears in the County Recorder's records,
> (available from any title officer) as well as the bogus deed that was
> provided to the forclosure company/lender to stop the sale that ended up in
> the MFR. I encourage you who have had this experience to do the same, and
> make an extra 30 minutes to meet Saturday.
>
> Jeff Smith
>
>
>
R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
OFF: (818) 734-7223
CEL: (818) 554-9922
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
business hours.
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If
you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute,
store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
Hi Jeff:While I don't have the resources, Judge Tighe did give me an order to subpoena video camera records from the Staples in Irvine where the individual who went to that store to FAX to the Foreclosure Trustee the offending Grant Deed in my case. Maybe a news story from FOX about what is being perpetrated on the public and all the misery that comes for it would help to educate the public about this crime. We can compare notes!
RenayOn Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, jbsesq1965 <jsmith@cgsattys.com> wrote:
Group:
On the subject of Hijacking. I am seeing some similarities in the bogus grant deeds that are the crux of the "hijacking" cases that have occurred in my office. It leads me to believe that the perpetrator(s) are possibly a small group of people. Someone out there who is offering to stall foreclosures for a fee, and using this method.
I'm going to bring examples of the bogus transfer deeds from my hijacked files to the meeting Saturday. I would like it if some of you would bring examples from your files of deeds purporting to transfer property to your client(s) that are bogus. I would like to invite anyone interested to meet with me after the program at 1:15p.m. or so to compare the offending deeds for a few minutes of collective forensic detective work.
We may be able to determine, I think, whether there are just a few people out there doing this hijacking, or if its more widespread, by comparing the evidence that is showing up in our cases. We may also be able to come up with some method of assisting the OUST or FBI in back tracking these things to their sources, so someone can start putting an end to it.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Group:
On the subject of Hijacking. I am seeing some similarities in the bogus grant deeds that are the crux of the "hijacking" cases that have occurred in my office. It leads me to believe that the perpetrator(s) are possibly a small group of people. Someone out there who is offering to stall foreclosures for a fee, and using this method.
I'm going to bring examples of the bogus transfer deeds from my hijacked files to the meeting Saturday. I would like it if some of you would bring examples from your files of deeds purporting to transfer property to your client(s) that are bogus. I would like to invite anyone interested to meet with me after the program at 1:15p.m. or so to compare the offending deeds for a few minutes of collective forensic detective work.
We may be able to determine, I think, whether there are just a few people out there doing this hijacking, or if its more widespread, by comparing the evidence that is showing up in our cases. We may also be able to come up with some method of assisting the OUST or FBI in back tracking these things to their sources, so someone can start putting an end to it.
I'm bringing the real deed as it appears in the County Recorder's records, (available from any title officer) as well as the bogus deed that was provided to the forclosure company/lender to stop the sale that ended up in the MFR. I encourage you who have had this experience to do the same, and make an extra 30 minutes to meet Saturday.
Jeff Smith

The post was migrated from Yahoo.