Cal CD: Is it a business case or a non-business case for purposes of RARA?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:57 am
charsetndows-1252
Wouldn't the determination of whether a matter is a business case be determined in part on whether the debt is primarily non-consumer debt?
On Nov 26, 2012, at 1:21 AM, Alik Segal wrote:
> The optional local form in the Central District of California, the Rights and Responsibilities Agreement ("RARA"), provides that where both attorney and clients agree to proceed under RARA, attorney can be paid up to $5K for a business chapter 13 case and up to $4K for a non-business case.
>
>
> Is a chapter 13 wage-earner case with two income real estate properties a business case or a non-business case for purposes of RARA?
>
> --
> Alik Segal
> Alik.Segal@gmail.com
> 310-362-6157
> California Central District
>
>
charsetndows-1252
Wouldn't the determination of whether a matter is a business case be determined in part on whether the debt is primarily non-consumer debt?On Nov 26, 2012, at 1:21 AM, Alik Segal <listserv.inbox@gmail.com> wrote:
The optional local form in the Central District of California, the Rights and Responsibilities Agreement ("RARA"), provides that where both attorney and clients agree to proceed under RARA, attorney can be paid up to $5K for a business chapter 13 case and up to $4K for a non-business case.
Is a chapter 13 wage-earner case with two income real estate properties a business case or a non-business case for purposes of RARA?-- Alik SegalAlik.Segal@gmail.com
310-362-6157California Central District
The post was migrated from Yahoo.