Cal CD: Is it a business case or a non-business case for
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 7:57 am
Even if the debtors are otherwise employed?
On Nov 26, 2012 7:50 AM, "Kirk Brennan" wrote:
> **
>
>
> Business
> On Nov 26, 2012 1:21 AM, "Alik Segal" wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> The optional local form in the Central District of California, the Rights
>> and Responsibilities Agreement ("RARA"), provides that where both attorney
>> and clients agree to proceed under RARA, attorney can be paid up to $5K for
>> a business chapter 13 case and up to $4K for a non-business case.
>>
>> Is a chapter 13 wage-earner case with two income real estate properties a
>> business case or a non-business case for purposes of RARA?
>>
>> --
>> Alik Segal
>> Alik.Segal@gmail.com
>> 310-362-6157
>> California Central District
>>
>
>
Even if the debtors are otherwise employed?
On Nov 26, 2012 7:50 AM, "Kirk Brennan" <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
Business
On Nov 26, 2012 1:21 AM, "Alik Segal" <listserv.inbox@gmail.com> wrote:
The optionallocal form in the Central District of California, theRights and Responsibilities Agreement ("RARA"), provides that where both attorney and clients agree to proceed under RARA, attorney can be paid up to $5K for a business chapter 13 case and up to $4K for a non-business case.
Is a chapter 13 wage-earner case with two income real estate properties a business case or a non-business case for purposes of RARA?-- Alik SegalAlik.Segal@gmail.com
310-362-6157California Central District
The post was migrated from Yahoo.