Motion to avoid judgment lien in 7 (Judge Carroll, Santa Barbara
Posted: Sat May 17, 2014 2:25 pm
Amend Schedule C to list an amount for even $1000. The Motion to avoid lien has to have an exemption which is being impaired. It doesn't make a difference that there is $0 equity.
That's most likely why Judge Riblet denied the motion.
Sent from my iPhone: Nathan Berneman
> On May 16, 2014, at 3:48 PM, "'Gerald McNally' gm@mcesq.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
> However, if you must reopen the case to avoid the lien, then be sure in your 5010 papers to notify the court that youll be amending Sch C.
>
>
>
> Gerry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gerald McNally
>
> McNally & Associates, P.C.
>
> 517 East Wilson Ave., Ste 104
>
> Glendale, CA 91206
>
> 818.507.5100
>
> Fax: 818.507.5001
>
>
>
> Notice to Recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this email in error, and review, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message and any and all duplicates of this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
>
>
>
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
>
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.