Representation After Conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7
Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 9:52 am
Chapter 13 client defaulted on plan and mortgage payments after confirmation and then converted to Chapter 7.
I reviewed the RARA and it only talks about the Chapter 13 case.
But it has various references to service the attorney is expected to provide "in the case".
In a different context, the Chapter 7 is the same "case" as the Chapter 13, ie has the same case number.
Does anyone think that the RARA requires the attorney to continue representing the client through the Chapter 7 case?
Jason Wallach
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.