.jpg)
Representation After Conversion from Chapter 13 to
In Chapter 13 we file a RARA if we charge the "no look" fee. In Chapter 7
we file a Limited Scope of Appearance.
They are not interchangeable, so I would argue that the RARA does not apply
in Chapter 7.
Christine A. Wilton
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jason Wallach
wrote:
> **
>
>
> Chapter 13 client defaulted on plan and mortgage payments after
> confirmation and then converted to Chapter 7.
>
> I reviewed the RARA and it only talks about the Chapter 13 case.
> But it has various references to service the attorney is expected to
> provide "in the case".
> In a different context, the Chapter 7 is the same "case" as the Chapter
> 13, ie has the same case number.
>
> Does anyone think that the RARA requires the attorney to continue
> representing the client through the Chapter 7 case?
>
> Jason Wallach
> jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
>
>
>
Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
*Office:*
5150 Candlewood Street, Suite 17F
Lakewood, CA 90712
*Mailing:*
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
Lakewood, CA 90712
Office: 877-631-2220
Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078
Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web: www.attorneychristine.com
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
In Chapter 13 we file a RARA if we charge the "no look" fee. In Chapter 7 we file a Limited Scope of Appearance.They are not interchangeable, so I would argue that the RARA does not apply in Chapter 7.
Christine A. WiltonOn Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jason Wallach <jwallach@gladstonemichel.com> wrote:
Chapter 13 client defaulted on plan and mortgage payments after confirmation and then converted to Chapter 7.
I reviewed the RARA and it only talks about the Chapter 13 case.
But it has various references to service the attorney is expected to provide "in the case".
In a different context, the Chapter 7 is the same "case" as the Chapter 13, ie has the same case number.
Does anyone think that the RARA requires the attorney to continue representing the client through the Chapter 7 case?
Jason Wallach
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
-- Christine A. Wilton, Esq.Law Office of Christine A. WiltonOffice:5150 Candlewood Street, Suite 17FLakewood, CA 90712Mailing:
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335Lakewood, CA 90712Office: 877-631-2220Cell: 562-824-7563Fax: 1-636-212-7078Email:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
charsetF-8;
format="flowed"
NO!
Mark T. Jessee
Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
"A Debt Relief Agency"
50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
(805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED TO BE
PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL
AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE
FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
On Tue, 8 May 2012 09:52:02 -0700, Jason Wallach wrote:
Chapter 13 client defaulted on plan and mortgage
payments after confirmation and then converted to Chapter 7.
I reviewed the RARA and it only talks about the Chapter 13 case.
But it has various references to service the attorney is expected to
provide "in the case".
In a different context, the Chapter 7 is the same "case" as the Chapter
13, ie has the same case number.
Does anyone think that the RARA requires the attorney to continue
representing the client through the Chapter 7 case?
Jason Wallach
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
start="6ml9elbrnksg@webmail.mysuperpageshosting.com"
charsetF-8
p{margin: 0;padding: 0;}NO!
Mark T. JesseeLaw Offices of Mark T. Jessee"A Debt Relief
Agency"50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360(805)
497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS
MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND THIS
COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED TO BE PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL
IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS
E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY
RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN
ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
On Tue, 8 May 2012 09:52:02 -0700, Jason Wallach
<jwallach@gladstonemichel.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.