Strip lien in chapter 7
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 12:47 pm
Ahhh yes okay I see now sorry
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Mark J. Markus wrote:
> **
>
>
> Yes, isn't that what the question originally asked?
>
> *excerpt:*
>
> I was wondering if anyone knows the case that states the debtor does not need current rquity in their home in order to strip a Judicial lien in a chapter 7.
>
> Jonathan D. Leventhal
> Leventhal Law Group, P. C.818-347-5800
>
>
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this means
> at
> http://www.bklaw.com/bankruptcy-blog/20 ... efinition/
> )
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office
> of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for
> the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
> disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is
> prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
> the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
> communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used,
> and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
> another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
> On 5/16/2012 8:01 PM, R Grace Rodriguez wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark J. Markus wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> In re Higgins, 201 B.R. 965 (9th Cir. BAP 1996)
>>
>> *************************
>>
>
> Isn't that case just for Judicial liens?
>
>
> R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
> OFF: (818) 734-7223
> CEL: (818) 554-9922
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and
> confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If
> you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute,
> store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
> delete this e-mail from your system.
>
>
>
R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
OFF: (818) 734-7223
CEL: (818) 554-9922
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
business hours.
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If
you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute,
store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
Ahhh yes okay I see now sorryOn Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Mark J. Markus <bklawr@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes, isn't that what the question
originally asked?
excerpt:
I was wondering if anyone knows the case that states the debtor does not need current rquity in their home in order to strip a Judicial lien in a chapter 7.
Jonathan D. Leventhal
Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
818-347-5800
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what
this means at
http://www.bklaw.com/bankruptcy-blog/20 ... efinition/)
The post was migrated from Yahoo.