It can be done [motion to reopen; motion to vacate discharge so that
Reaffirmation Agreement may be filed] It depends upon the Judge. I have done
it successfully with Judges Neiter and Tighe, but do not know if all judges will
allow it.
Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
Telephone: (818) 226-1205
Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY
BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW,DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY.
THANK YOU.
________________________________
To:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, May 28, 2012 8:51:18 AM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Reopening case to file a reaffirmation agreement?
Can this be done? I've reviewed the reasons for re-opening a case by thedebtor, and doing it to file a reaffirmation agreement doesn't seem to be one.
But I've spoken with a few other attorneys that "are pretty sure" it can be
done. I have a client who wishes to do this on her residence (for which no
reaff was filed) so she can continue to build her credit through her lender It
isn't something I advise, but I would like to inform her at least as to what
her options are, and so I wonder if re-opening the case to file a reaff is even
a possibility. Thank you all.
Jason Boyer
Boyer Tadros Law, PC
5150 E. Pacific Coast Hwy, Suite 200
Long Beach, CA 90804
T: 562-346-3276
F: 562-684-0775
jboyer@boyertadroslaw.com
www.boyertadroslaw.com
TREASURY NOTICE: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax
practice, you are hereby advised that any written tax advice contained herein
was not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any taxpayer for
the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or
previous e-mail messages attached to it is intended only for the use of theindividual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that
is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return the original to
us by mail without making a copy. This communication constitutes an electronic
communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
18 U.S.C. 2510 et seq.
It can be done [motion to reopen; motion to vacate discharge so that Reaffirmation Agreement may be filed] It depends upon the Judge. I have done it successfully with Judges Neiter and Tighe, but do not know if all judges will allow it.Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226Telephone: (818) 226-1205Facsimile : (818) 226-1213THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT
THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.From: Jason Boyer <
jboyer@boyertadroslaw.com>To:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.comSent: Mon, May 28, 2012 8:51:18 AMSubject: [cdcbaa]
Reopening case to file a reaffirmation agreement?
Can this be done? I've reviewed the reasons for re-opening a case by
the debtor, and doing it to file a reaffirmation agreement doesn't seem
to be one. But I've spoken with a few other attorneys that "are pretty
sure" it can be done. I have a client who wishes to do this on her
residence (for which no reaff was filed) so she can continue to build
her credit through her lender It isn't something I advise, but I would
like to inform her at least as to what her options are, and so I wonder
if re-opening the case to file a reaff is even a possibility. Thank you
all.-- Jason BoyerBoyer Tadros Law, PC5150 E. Pacific Coast Hwy, Suite 200Long Beach, CA 90804T: 562-346-3276
F:
562-684-0775jboyer@boyertadroslaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.