Child Support as Reasonable and Necessary
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:28 am
Nate:
Amend the skds. List the full amount due in the description. Then state "value listed is the amont reasonably expected to be collected, although if the flake ex wins the lottery it may all be collectable". List a value under $23k and exempt. Use the new Supreme Ct. case and exempt "All".
Of course I am inferring that by stating there is a large arrears and the ex filed 7 also, you are saying theex is a flake and won't pay..
Claim entire amount is R & N.
Then tell the judge the creditor is fishing and needs to fnid another pond.
The real issue is what will the trustee do?
If the trustee won't try to collect, under 349 the entire amount goes back to the debtor anyway, so I'd also tell the judge there is no justicable dispute, as there is noremedy for the creditor as there is no way for the estate to collect and make a distribution. Was there a report of no distribution (what we used to call a no asset report)?
I just hope the flake is not a dad, at least not today.
Happy Father's Day to all the dads! The google doodle is pretty cool today.
d
The post was migrated from Yahoo.