Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

You're outta my will!
te:
>
> I'm with Roksana on this one.
>
> Respectfully,
> Peter
>
>
> ________________________________
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 7:13 PM
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Re: Bifurcating Joint 13
>
>
>
>
>
> Hubby is not liable just because of community prop state. I think hubby qualifies. But I don't think you can strip lien when only one is in ch 13. Both transferred an interest in the prop. Roksana disagrees by the way.
>
> "the flag is up." Jim Healy
>
> --- In mailto:cdcbaa%40yahoogroups.com, Dennis wrote:
> >
> > In CA community is liable, isn't it? So how do you say h isn't liable after you bifurcate?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:00 PM, "Steven" wrote:
> >
> > > Have a Chapter 13 where they met 109e limits based on credit reports but claims came in which total exceeds the limit for unsecured debt. Read "Everything you need to know about Chapter 13" from our 9-24-11 seminar and found a case, In re Kevitch a PA case, which allowed the case to be bifurcated. Has anyone had to do this here? I am before Judge Brand.
> > >
> > > Wife is over the debt limits as almost all credit cards are in her name. Thought was to bifurcate case and put her in a 7 and leave husband in 13 to avoid 2nd mortgage and pay back arrears to first.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Steven A. Wolvek, Esq.
> > > Law Offices of Steven A. Wolvek
> > > 23480 Park Sorrento, Suite 109-A
> > > Calabasas, CA 91302
> > > Phone:(818) 227-3379
> > > FAX: (818) 227-3383
> > > Web: wolveklaw.com
> > >
> > > IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I'm with Roksana on this one.
Respectfully,
Peter
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Re: Bifurcating Joint 13
Hubby is not liable just because of community prop state. I think hubby qualifies. But I don't think you can strip lien when only one is in ch 13. Both transferred an interest in the prop. Roksana disagrees by the way.
"the flag is up." Jim Healy
>
> In CA community is liable, isn't it? So how do you say h isn't liable after you bifurcate?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:00 PM, "Steven" wrote:
>
> > Have a Chapter 13 where they met 109e limits based on credit reports but claims came in which total exceeds the limit for unsecured debt. Read "Everything you need to know about Chapter 13" from our 9-24-11 seminar and found a case, In re Kevitch a PA case, which allowed the case to be bifurcated. Has anyone had to do this here? I am before Judge Brand.
> >
> > Wife is over the debt limits as almost all credit cards are in her name. Thought was to bifurcate case and put her in a 7 and leave husband in 13 to avoid 2nd mortgage and pay back arrears to first.
> >
> > Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> >
> > Steven A. Wolvek, Esq.
> > Law Offices of Steven A. Wolvek
> > 23480 Park Sorrento, Suite 109-A
> > Calabasas, CA 91302
> > Phone:(818) 227-3379
> > FAX: (818) 227-3383
> > Web: wolveklaw.com
> >
> > IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Hubby is not liable just because of community prop state. I think hubby qualifies. But I don't think you can strip lien when only one is in ch 13. Both transferred an interest in the prop. Roksana disagrees by the way.
"the flag is up." Jim Healy
>
> In CA community is liable, isn't it? So how do you say h isn't liable after you bifurcate?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:00 PM, "Steven" wrote:
>
> > Have a Chapter 13 where they met 109e limits based on credit reports but claims came in which total exceeds the limit for unsecured debt. Read "Everything you need to know about Chapter 13" from our 9-24-11 seminar and found a case, In re Kevitch a PA case, which allowed the case to be bifurcated. Has anyone had to do this here? I am before Judge Brand.
> >
> > Wife is over the debt limits as almost all credit cards are in her name. Thought was to bifurcate case and put her in a 7 and leave husband in 13 to avoid 2nd mortgage and pay back arrears to first.
> >
> > Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> >
> > Steven A. Wolvek, Esq.
> > Law Offices of Steven A. Wolvek
> > 23480 Park Sorrento, Suite 109-A
> > Calabasas, CA 91302
> > Phone:(818) 227-3379
> > FAX: (818) 227-3383
> > Web: wolveklaw.com
> >
> > IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

In CA community is liable, isn't it? So how do you say h isn't liable after you bifurcate?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:00 PM, "Steven" wrote:
> Have a Chapter 13 where they met 109e limits based on credit reports but claims came in which total exceeds the limit for unsecured debt. Read "Everything you need to know about Chapter 13" from our 9-24-11 seminar and found a case, In re Kevitch a PA case, which allowed the case to be bifurcated. Has anyone had to do this here? I am before Judge Brand.
>
> Wife is over the debt limits as almost all credit cards are in her name. Thought was to bifurcate case and put her in a 7 and leave husband in 13 to avoid 2nd mortgage and pay back arrears to first.
>
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.
>
> Steven A. Wolvek, Esq.
> Law Offices of Steven A. Wolvek
> 23480 Park Sorrento, Suite 109-A
> Calabasas, CA 91302
> Phone:(818) 227-3379
> FAX: (818) 227-3383
> Web: wolveklaw.com
>
> IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
In CA community is liable, isn't it? So how do you say h isn't liable after you bifurcate? Sent from my iPhoneOn Jun 28, 2012, at 4:00 PM, "Steven" <wolveklaw@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Have a Chapter 13 where they met 109e limits based on credit reports but claims came in which total exceeds the limit for unsecured debt. Read "Everything you need to know about Chapter 13" from our 9-24-11 seminar and found a case, In re Kevitch a PA case, which allowed the case to be bifurcated. Has anyone had to do this here? I am before Judge Brand.
Wife is over the debt limits as almost all credit cards are in her name. Thought was to bifurcate case and put her in a 7 and leave husband in 13 to avoid 2nd mortgage and pay back arrears to first.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Steven A. Wolvek, Esq.
Law Offices of Steven A. Wolvek
23480 Park Sorrento, Suite 109-A
Calabasas, CA 91302
Phone:(818) 227-3379
FAX: (818) 227-3383
Web: wolveklaw.com
IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Have a Chapter 13 where they met 109e limits based on credit reports but claims came in which total exceeds the limit for unsecured debt. Read "Everything you need to know about Chapter 13" from our 9-24-11 seminar and found a case, In re Kevitch a PA case, which allowed the case to be bifurcated. Has anyone had to do this here? I am before Judge Brand.
Wife is over the debt limits as almost all credit cards are in her name. Thought was to bifurcate case and put her in a 7 and leave husband in 13 to avoid 2nd mortgage and pay back arrears to first.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Steven A. Wolvek, Esq.
Law Offices of Steven A. Wolvek
23480 Park Sorrento, Suite 109-A
Calabasas, CA 91302
Phone:(818) 227-3379
FAX: (818) 227-3383
Web: wolveklaw.com
IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.