I have this same situation, and the client is begging me to re-open to case
to obtain and file a reaffirmation agreement. Also interested to know any
wisdom here.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Jaenam Coe wrote:
> **
>
>
> I have a closed CH7 case where my client had an upside-down house
> mortgage with Citibank. The client says that Citi is not allowing
> automatic/internet payment option resumed because he did not reaffirm the
> loan. I have rarely heard of "reaffirming" home mortgages, under water or
> not, and didn't think one is required to keep the home, so long as the
> monthly payments are made on time. Has things changed recently? Or is it
> just that particular client?
>
>
>
Jason Boyer
Boyer Tadros Law, PC
5150 E. Pacific Coast Hwy, Suite 200
Long Beach, CA 90804
T: 562-346-3276
F: 562-684-0775
jboyer@boyertadroslaw.com
www.boyertadroslaw.com
TREASURY NOTICE: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax
practice, you are hereby advised that any written tax advice contained
herein was not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files
or previous e-mail messages attached to it is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by telephone, and return the original to us by mail without making a copy.
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the
meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 et
seq.
I have this same situation, and the client is begging me to re-open to case to obtain and file a reaffirmation agreement. Also interested to know any wisdom here.On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Jaenam Coe <
jaenamcoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have a closed CH7 case where my client had an upside-down house mortgage with Citibank. The client says that Citi is not allowing automatic/internet payment option resumed because he did not reaffirm the loan. I have rarely heard of "reaffirming" home mortgages, under water or not, and didn't think one is required to keep the home, so long as the monthly payments are made on time. Has things changed recently? Or is it just that particular client?
-- Jason BoyerBoyer Tadros Law, PC5150 E. Pacific Coast Hwy, Suite 200Long Beach, CA 90804T: 562-346-3276F:
562-684-0775jboyer@boyertadroslaw.com
www.boyertadroslaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.