Would you refer me to a case number where you did this?
Judge is a stickler on procedural stuff, so I need to get it right.
Thanks,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Steven B. Lever wrote:
> **
>
>
> Sanctions. Disallowance of claim to the extent you sought.****
>
> ** **
>
> Steven B. Lever ****
>
> *From:*
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:05 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] discovery served, no response. Next steps?****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Discovery (RFP) was served on lenders counsel after filing of a motion
> disallow claim (objection to claim).
> No response has been received and it has been almost two months.
> What do you all suggest as next steps? Motion to compel?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
>
www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1416 / Virus Database: 2109/4779 - Release Date: 02/01/12***
> *
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Would you refer me to a case number where you did this?Judge is a stickler on procedural stuff, so I need to get it right.Thanks,On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Steven B. Lever <
sblever@leverlaw.com> wrote:
Sanctions. Disallowance of claim to the extent you sought.
Steven B. Lever From:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirk Brennan
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:05 PMTo: Cdcbaa Yahoo ListservSubject: [cdcbaa] discovery served, no response. Next steps? Discovery (RFP) was served on lenders counsel after filing of a motion disallow claim (objection to claim). No response has been received and it has been almost two months.
What do you all suggest as next steps? Motion to compel? Thanks,-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG -
www.avg.comVersion: 10.0.1416 / Virus Database: 2109/4779 - Release Date: 02/01/12
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.