judges copy rejected for not being stapled/fastened
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:43 pm
Please read the rule book. It is your job to follow the rules. It is not nitpicking to reject documents.
________________________________
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 5:48 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] judges copy rejected for not being stapled/fastened
Judge's copy just got rejected by clerk for not being stapled or fastened together.
Anyone else have to deal with this kind of nitpicking?
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.