Page 1 of 1

serving plan and disco prior to hearing on adequacy of di=

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:19 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Catherine:
It depends on the judge, Judge Bluebond approved a Disclsoure Statement for me yesterday and told me I could just use a notice.
I have never had any judge tell me that I had to use an order, but take a look at:

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

serving plan and disco prior to hearing on adequacy of di=

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:39 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Kirk:
You need to sit down and read the rule book. Chapter 11 is not for people who don't know the rules.
A disclosure statement is not a disco.
I used to go to disco's in the 70's, had long hair, danced a bunch with one finger in the air. Don't do that in court.
A disclosure statement is a security. If you don't have an exception to the Federal and State securities laws, I wouldn't be mailing one all over the place. You could go to prison.
dennis
________________________________
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 7:32 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] serving plan and disco prior to hearing on adequacy of disco (chapter 11)
For those of you who do chapter 11s:
When you initially file the Plan and Disco Stmt, but prior to the hearing on the adequacy of the Disco Statement, do you generally serve the Plan and Disco Statement on creditors?
Or do you just serve the Notice of Hearing on adequacy of Disco Statement, and then wait for the hearing, since you might have to amend the documents based on what the judge says at the hearing?
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.