Los Angeles 341a update: Your 11 a.m case could be heard at 1:30 p.m or later!
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:19 pm
Reply-To: "Sun N. Han, Esq."
X-Original-Return-Path: "Sun N. Han, Esq."
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: groups-system
If the meal time is (1) given while working, meaning eat while you work; & (2) that minimum of 30 minutes or whatever time is PAID at a regular payrate, then no one is breaking the CA IWC law.
Unless the hourly rate for the security guard is very high, can we ask US Trustee to pay a little extra? How about offering ending the day a bit earlier, i.e. like 3:30 or 4pm in lieu of the lunch hour being paid out during 12:15 to 1pm?
Sun N. Han,
Attorney at Law
Confidentiality Note:
The information contained in this electronic mail is legally privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone 213-385-1777 and return the original message to us at the above listed address via electronic mail then delete it from your system. We will reimburse you for telephone expenses involved. Thank you. atty7@koamlaw.com
Tel: 213-385-1777 * Fax: 213-380-1777
From: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 2:23 PM
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Subject: [cdcbaa] Los Angeles 341a update: Your 11 a.m case could be heard at 1:30 p.m or later!
Dear Esteemed Colleagues,
There is now a mandatory lunch break for the security guard at the meeting of creditors venue in Downtown Los Angeles. If the 11 a.m calendar is not completed by 12:15 p.m, the cases that were not completed on the 11 a.m. calendar will be called on the 1:30 p.m calendar, so plan accordingly.
My understanding about the change in policy is to comply with California State Labor Law and to maintain the security of the premises.
If we can assist the United States Trustee in ameliorating their concerns about compliance, this might be able to reverse this policy. One place that maybe useful is this link https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/faq_mealperiods.htm
I thank you in advance for your input and support.
Sincerely,
David Jacob
Information contained in this e-mail transmission may be privileged, confidential and covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, distribute, or reproduce this transmission. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete the message from your system. Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the U. S. Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the U. S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
X-Original-Return-Path: "Sun N. Han, Esq."
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: groups-system
If the meal time is (1) given while working, meaning eat while you work; & (2) that minimum of 30 minutes or whatever time is PAID at a regular payrate, then no one is breaking the CA IWC law.
Unless the hourly rate for the security guard is very high, can we ask US Trustee to pay a little extra? How about offering ending the day a bit earlier, i.e. like 3:30 or 4pm in lieu of the lunch hour being paid out during 12:15 to 1pm?
Sun N. Han,
Attorney at Law
Confidentiality Note:
The information contained in this electronic mail is legally privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone 213-385-1777 and return the original message to us at the above listed address via electronic mail then delete it from your system. We will reimburse you for telephone expenses involved. Thank you. atty7@koamlaw.com
Tel: 213-385-1777 * Fax: 213-380-1777
From: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 2:23 PM
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Subject: [cdcbaa] Los Angeles 341a update: Your 11 a.m case could be heard at 1:30 p.m or later!
Dear Esteemed Colleagues,
There is now a mandatory lunch break for the security guard at the meeting of creditors venue in Downtown Los Angeles. If the 11 a.m calendar is not completed by 12:15 p.m, the cases that were not completed on the 11 a.m. calendar will be called on the 1:30 p.m calendar, so plan accordingly.
My understanding about the change in policy is to comply with California State Labor Law and to maintain the security of the premises.
If we can assist the United States Trustee in ameliorating their concerns about compliance, this might be able to reverse this policy. One place that maybe useful is this link https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/faq_mealperiods.htm
I thank you in advance for your input and support.
Sincerely,
David Jacob
Information contained in this e-mail transmission may be privileged, confidential and covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, distribute, or reproduce this transmission. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete the message from your system. Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the U. S. Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the U. S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.