Service of Declarations under LBR 9013-1(o)
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:17 pm
I think youcan rely on the limitationfor serviceafter the motion under9013-1(g)(2).Peter M. Lively, J.D., M.B.A.
Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I
11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647
Telephone: (310) 391-2400* Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:13 AM, "tuanl@stevelopezlaw.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
Dear list,
I filed a motion under LBR 9013-1(o) and no parties opposed the motion and the 14 day period has expired. My question is regarding service of the declaration of service and non-response. I read the local rules under LBR 9013-1(o)(3)(A) which states:
"No service is required prior to filing the declaration."
I might be misreading this but the rule seems to be ambiguous. Is service of the declaration of service and non-response waived on all parties?? It wouldn't make sense to force the debtor to serve the declaration since no one bothered to oppose the motion. I would generally just serve the declaration but the case I'm working on has over 100 creditors and I'm trying to save my client money where possible.
Thanks.
Regards,Tuan LeTuan Le, Esq.Law Offices of Steve Lopez8562 Florence Avenue, Suite ADowney, California 90240Main: (562)904-1193Fax: (562)262-2846lso be legally privileged. If you are not anintended recipient, as indicated above, please notify us immediately. Insuch event, you should not copy or use this e-mail for any purpose nor discloseits contents to anyone. Enclosed information and attachments remain theproperty of the LAW OFFICE OF STEVE LOPEZ. Opinions, conclusions, attachments,and neither information in this message that do not relate to the officialbusiness of the LAW OFFICE OF STEVE LOPEZ should be understood as my personalresponsibility, and as neither given nor endorsed by the LAW OFFICE OF STEVE LOPEZ. #yiv6348
The post was migrated from Yahoo.