=?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_[cdcbaa]_New_CA_appellate_case_on_BK_=A7_108_?=
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:49 am
charsetndows-1252
Just asking: didn't they miss the dispositive point that the automatic stay does not apply to an action in which the debtor is plaintiff, no matter whether the procedure to be undertaken might result in an adverse outcome for the debtor, like an appeal by the defendant, or a motion re costs?
Jason Wallach
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
On Feb 7, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Patrick T. Green wrote:
>
> http://www.metnews.com/sos.cgi?0212%2FB230595
>
>
>
>
>
> If you have any questions or concerns please contact me.
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> Patrick T. Green
>
> Attorney at Law
>
> 1010 E. Union St. Suite 206
>
> Pasadena, CA 91106
>
> Tel: 626-449-8433
>
> Fax: 626-449-0565
>
> Email: pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
charsetndows-1252
Just asking: didn't they miss the dispositive point that the automatic stay does not apply to an action in which the debtor is plaintiff, no matter whether the procedure to be undertaken might result in an adverse outcome for the debtor, like an appeal by the defendant, or a motion re costs?
Jason Wallach
The post was migrated from Yahoo.