Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

I agree it should be the petition date.
Any of you know why our local forms require the Debtor to put in the
*current* value of the liens? (Bottom of page 2:

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I don't have the case law but I believe it's the petition date. I have
opened old cases to do a 522(f) and it's tough to get an appraiser who can
do a retroactive appraisal for the date of filing, but they can do it.
Holly Roark
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
*and Sports Lawyer*
holly@roarklawoffices.com **primary email address**
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California - Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600; F (310) 553-2601
*By State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
**Counsel for Chapter 13 Trustee Kathleen A. McCallister (Idaho) T (208)
922-5100
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com
[cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> Is there a definitive rule in our district as to what date to use for
> valuation purposes in a 522(f) motion?
>
> Is it the petition filing date or the date the Motion/adversary is filed?
>
> I could have sworn it was the former, but I can't locate the case I
> thought existed.
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> *Mailing Address Only:*
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of
> Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office
> of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for
> the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
> disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is
> prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
> the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
> communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used,
> and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
> another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
>
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Petition date because it relates toa claim of exemption of the debtor's interest in property of the estate on the filing date.Peter M. Lively, J.D., M.B.A.
Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I
11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647
Telephone: (310) 391-2400* Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:23 AM, "'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
Is there a definitive rule in our district as to what date to use for valuation purposes in a 522(f) motion?
Is it the petition filing date or the date the Motion/adversary is filed? I could have sworn it was the former, but I can't locate the case I thought existed.
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
Mailing Address Only:
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
________________________________________________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.