Judge Neiter and BAP opinions - does he consider them binding?
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 8:42 pm
No, he does not consider the BAP binding. He believes the absolute priority rule still applies.
He will make his own decision on each issue that has not been decided by the 9th cir.
d
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
> On May 15, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Giovanni Orantes go@gobklaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> I would greatly appreciate your urgent input.
>
> --
> Giovanni Orantes, Esq.*
> Orantes Law Firm, P.C.
> 3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 2920
> Los Angeles, CA 90010
> Tel: (213) 389-4362
> Fax: (877) 789-5776
> e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
> website: www.gobklaw.com
>
> *Certified Bankruptcy Specialist, State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization
> *Board Certified - Business Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification
> *Board Certified - Consumer Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification
> Commercial Litigation
> Estate Planning
> Outside General Counsel
>
>
>
> WE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
>
> SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO AND SANTA BARBARA AND THE WORLD FOR CHAPTER 11 AND 15 CASES.
>
> Note: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete the original e-mail >
type="text/html";
boundaryple-Mail-207CBAE6-68E7-42B4-ADAE-51B44158E3B5
The post was migrated from Yahoo.