.jpg)
Why do banks file RFS in CH7? =C2=A0=C2=A0 I assume y=
If the court enters relief, even after the case is closed, or the fact that a relief from stay motion was filed in the case is information that must be listed on the Motion to Extend the Stay, which is necessary if a second or third BK is filed within a year of the dismissal.
This is really critical if the 3rd filing is on the day before the foreclosure sale and there isn't time to obtain an order extending the stay entered before the foreclosure sale.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
Certified Specialist, Bankruptcy Law, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On Sunday, October 5, 2014 11:00 AM, "cdcbaa cdcbaamailbox@gmail.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
Guys:
This discussion was not appropriate for our list.
if you cannot say something nice about other lawyers who are in our group. Say nothing.
D
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
On Oct 2, 2014, at 5:13 PM, 'Larry Webb' larry@webbklaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
Sorry I thought that was understood. Best regardsLarry Webb California Board of Legal SpecializationCertified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law State Bar of California 229344Central District California"A Debt Relief Agency"Check out my Blog cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:57 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Why do banks file RFS in CH7? I assume you're looking for a better answer than: For the attorneys to make money.
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
Mailing Address Only:
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
________________________________________________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication. On 10/2/2014 12:02 PM, 'Larry Webb' larry@webbklaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
US Bank aka Wells Fargo has filed a RFS motion in one of my no asset ch7 cases. The debtors are underwater on the 2nd and 3rd [all WF] and barely above water on the first [cost of sale plus note exceeds value]oan mod to pay arrears. Debtors cannot afford ch13 plan payments. discharge and the case will be closed before Wells Fargo gets the RFS order entered, so why file it?WF had asked for a reaffirmation agreement, debtors declined. Is the RFS retribution? Best regardsLarry WebbCalifornia Board of Legal SpecializationCertified Specialist in Bankruptcy LawState Bar of California 229344Central District California"A Debt Relief Agency"Check out my Blog 93010P 805.987.1400F 805.987.2866C 805.750.2150
The post was migrated from Yahoo.