Page 1 of 1

Which Form Order To Use On Denial of Motion to Impose Stay Under 362(c)(4)?

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:53 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Sort of. Mine is a little different because the court granted in part and denied in part. You should probably do your own order.
Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 792-5864 (tel)
(310) 347-4353 (fax)
MitnickLaw@aol.com
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2016, at 6:49 PM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> Geez...it's easier to just create a new order from scratch. You know, like we did in the old days? :)
>
>> On 6/1/2016 6:44 PM, Office mitnicklaw@aol.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>> I found the same problem today. I modified the order granting the motion to impose/continue order and I'm filing a short declaration as to why I changed the mandatory order when I lodge the order.
>>
>>
>> Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
>> 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
>> Torrance, CA 90503
>> (310) 792-5864 (tel)
>> (310) 347-4353 (fax)
>> MitnickLaw@aol.com
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:59 PM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We have a mandatory court form (F 4001-1.IMPOSE.STAY.MOTION) to use when seeking to impose or continue the automatic stay under 362(c)(3) and (c)(4).
>>>
>>> We also have a mandatory order GRANTING the above motion, but we have no Order DENYING the motion, and the order granting has no fields for denying the motion.
>>>
>>> The regular MRS Order Denying doesn't really have language that applies to the Motion to Impose or Continue the Stay.
>>>
>>> So am I free to create my own order, or am I missing one of the mandatory form orders that would apply to a DENIAL of the 362(c)(3) or (4) motion?
>>> --
>>>
>>> *************************
>>> Mark J. Markus
>>> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
>>> Mailing Address Only:
>>> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
>>> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
>>> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
>>> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
>>> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
>>> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
>>> ________________________________________________
>>> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
>>> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
>
>
> --
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> Mailing Address Only:
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Which Form Order To Use On Denial of Motion to Impose Stay Under 362(c)(4)?

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:44 pm
by Yahoo Bot

I found the same problem today. I modified the order granting the motion to impose/continue order and I'm filing a short declaration as to why I changed the mandatory order when I lodge the order.
Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 792-5864 (tel)
(310) 347-4353 (fax)
MitnickLaw@aol.com
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:59 PM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> We have a mandatory court form (F 4001-1.IMPOSE.STAY.MOTION) to use when seeking to impose or continue the automatic stay under 362(c)(3) and (c)(4).
>
> We also have a mandatory order GRANTING the above motion, but we have no Order DENYING the motion, and the order granting has no fields for denying the motion.
>
> The regular MRS Order Denying doesn't really have language that applies to the Motion to Impose or Continue the Stay.
>
> So am I free to create my own order, or am I missing one of the mandatory form orders that would apply to a DENIAL of the 362(c)(3) or (4) motion?
> --
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> Mailing Address Only:
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.