Second Filing Automatic Stay Judge Klein
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:54 am
Reply-To: "Joshua"
X-Original-Return-Path: "Joshua"
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: groups-system
Hello Group,
I was recently in front of Judge Zurzolo on a 2nd Chapter 13 Filing within
one year of each other. It was brought to my attention I did not need to
file a Motion to Impose the Stay as it pertained to real property of the
debtor because Judge Zurzolo's stance was the 30-Day Automatic Stay in the
2nd case applied to the individual and not to the estate.
My question is - does Judge Klein share the same view?
I am again in a 2nd Chapter 13 filing within one year of each other and am
attempting to determine if I need to file a Motion to Impose the Stay. The
debtor in this case will be making postpetition DOT payments and payments
towards arrears thru the Plan Payments.
Thank you in advance for any insight to Judge Klein's opinion.
Joshua L. Sternberg, Esq.
Sternberg Law Group
9454 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 310
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
T (310) 270-4343
F (310) 270-4344
js@sternberglawgroup.com
www.sternberglawgroup.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE EMAIL IS CONFIDENTIAL; IT MAY BE SUBJECT TO
THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND MAY CONSTITUTE WORK PRODUCT. THE
INFORMATION IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO
WHICH IT IS ADDRESSES. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT ANY USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS
COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS EMAIL IN
ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US
AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
X-Original-Return-Path: "Joshua"
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: groups-system
Hello Group,
I was recently in front of Judge Zurzolo on a 2nd Chapter 13 Filing within
one year of each other. It was brought to my attention I did not need to
file a Motion to Impose the Stay as it pertained to real property of the
debtor because Judge Zurzolo's stance was the 30-Day Automatic Stay in the
2nd case applied to the individual and not to the estate.
My question is - does Judge Klein share the same view?
I am again in a 2nd Chapter 13 filing within one year of each other and am
attempting to determine if I need to file a Motion to Impose the Stay. The
debtor in this case will be making postpetition DOT payments and payments
towards arrears thru the Plan Payments.
Thank you in advance for any insight to Judge Klein's opinion.
Joshua L. Sternberg, Esq.
Sternberg Law Group
9454 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 310
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
T (310) 270-4343
F (310) 270-4344
js@sternberglawgroup.com
www.sternberglawgroup.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE EMAIL IS CONFIDENTIAL; IT MAY BE SUBJECT TO
THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND MAY CONSTITUTE WORK PRODUCT. THE
INFORMATION IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO
WHICH IT IS ADDRESSES. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT ANY USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS
COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS EMAIL IN
ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US
AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.