When/how does a credit union assert its right to cross collateralize?
I have a case where a client entered into a pro se reaffirmation agreement
with credit union. No mention of any cross collateralization issue at time
client negotiated reaffirmation. Reaffirmation agreement was approved -
Debtor received discharge - case was closed.
Now - Debtor receives 2009 tax refund that was automatically deposited into
account with same credit union. Credit union is holding on to the tax
refund and applying it to an unsecured debt of theirs that was discharged in
the chapter 7. They are claiming that cross-collateralization allows them
to apply the tax refund to the credit card that was discharged.
Is this proper?
Donny Brand
Brand & Spellman PC
3836 E. Anaheim St.
Long Beach, CA 90804
562-438-7500
888-99-BKRPT (888-992-5778)
www.brandspellman.com
This message originates from the law firm of Brand & Spellman PC and may
contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for
the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have
received this message in error, please notify us at
info@brandspellman.com and delete this email
from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other
use of this email or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
When/how does a credit union assert its right to cross
collateralize?
I have a case where a client entered into a pro se
reaffirmation agreement with credit union. No mention of any cross
collateralization issue at time client negotiated reaffirmation. Reaffirmation
The post was migrated from Yahoo.