Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Payments necessary until plan confo.
Dennis McGoldrick
350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B
Torrance, CA 90503
On May 7, 2010, at 10:14 AM, "John" wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Stipulation re Avoidance of a Second Lien in a Chapter 13 case, but so far the lender does not want to in clude language in the stipulation that no preconfirmation mortgage payments would be required pending confirmation (EC case). A0Will Judge Carroll re quire payments pending the confirmation hearing given that the lender is wi lling to stip to avoidance of the lien? A0
Thanks,
Daniela P. RomeroLaw Office of Daniela Romero, APLC
1015 N. Lake Ave., Ste. 115
Pasa dena, CA 91104
Telephone:626-817-2611
Facsimile: A0626-628-1781
email: A0dro merolaw@gmail.com
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electroni c Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. A7A7 2510-2521. A0The informatio n herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under app licable law. A0This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. A0If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. A0The o riginator of this e-mail and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or gu arantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or tha t this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. A0Delive ry of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the inte nded recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. A0If you h ave received this message in error, please promptly
notify the sender by e- mail and immediately delete this message.
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Fe deral tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, andern al Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party an y transaction or matter addressed herein.
Payments necessary until plan confo.Dennis McGoldrick350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207BTorrance, CA 90503On May 7, 2010, at 10:14 AM, "John" <j.d.faucher@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Hi all,I have a Stipulation re Avoidance of a
Second Lien in a Chapter 13 case, but so far the lender does not want to include language in the stipulation that no preconfirmation mortgage payments would be required pending confirmation (EC case). A0Will Judge Carroll re
quire payments pending the confirmation hearing given that the lender is willing to stip to avoidance of the lien? A0
Thanks,Daniela P. RomeroLaw Office of Daniela Romero, APLC1015 N. Lake Ave., Ste. 115Pasa
dena, CA 91104Telephone:626-817-2611Facsimile: A0626-628-1781
email: A0dro
merolaw@gmail.com
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. A7A7 2510-2521. A0The informatio
n herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law. A0This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for
the use of the addressee hereof. A0If you are not the intended recipient
of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. A0The o
riginator of this e-mail and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. A0Delive
ry of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. A0If you h
ave received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by e-mail and immediately delete this message.
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Hello listmates -
I am in an adversary proceeding where, at a hearing, opposing counsel said she wanted to amend her complaint. Judge Riblet gave her 10 days to do so. On the 10th day, she served us with the amended complaint, but still has not filed it two weeks later. I don't want to alert the opposition to this fact if I can avoid it. Am I safe ignoring the served amended complaint until opposing counsel realizes she needs to file it?
Does anyone have a better suggestion for handling this situation?
- John D. Faucher
Hurlbett & Faucher

The post was migrated from Yahoo.