Page 1 of 1
Baeza
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:31 pm
by Yahoo Bot
charset="US-ASCII"
This case is 180 degrees opposite of Judge Bowie's ruling in the Southern
District of California in the Johnson case. I have the same facts in a case
in which Judge Robles ruled in my clients' favor. The OUST filed a Motion
for Reconsideration and we have a hearing on 2/19. Wish me luck.
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
Toll Free: 1-866-576-6275
web:
http://www.bklaw.com/
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this means at
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Baeza
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:15 pm
by Yahoo Bot
12/29/08 Eastern District decision - 707(b)(3) case holding that there's
abuse if the totality of the circumstances show the debtor could repay a
"substantial" portion of their unsecured debt. It's irrelevant whether they
would be obligated to repay in a Chapter 13. (attached).
Hale
12/29/08 Eastern
District decision - 707(b)(3) case holding that there's abuse if the totality of
the circumstances show the debtor could repay a "substantial" portion of their
unsecured debt. It's irrelevant whether they would be obligated to repay
in a Chapter 13. (attached).
Hale
name="Baeza.pdf"
filename="Baeza.pdf"
The post was migrated from Yahoo.