Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Thanks so much for contributing information like this--I started doing
BKs in 1981 and whenever these kinds of problems came up you just had
to ask everyone you could think of for the answer and hope they were
right.
Luckily most of the experts were in the Federal Bldg cafeteria looking
at their beepers.
Marge Norman
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:06:21 -0800
"Jeffery B Smith" wrote:
> I think this was discussed at last month's meeting. The issue is
>really
> semantic, but makes a difference when you try to upload an order
>after the
> hearing. Anything not entitled "Motion..for something" doesn't get
>a docket
> entry in LOU. If you file an "Objection to Claim" and the court
>grants it,
> when you go to upload your order, there is no corresponding event to
>tie the
> order to, and you are in "Order Limbo", forever. It happened to me
>on a
> couple of matters earlier this year. If you entitle most of your
>pleadings
> "Motion .for something" you avoid the problem. I had this come up
>twice
> with "applications" I filed to approve stipulations on reverse
>notice as
> allowed by the Local Rules. After filing my declaration that no
>timely
> opposition was received, I couldn't upload the LOU orders, because
>there was
> no event to tie it to. Lou apparently only recognizes things called
> "Motions".
>
>
>
> -Jeffrey B. Smith
>
> CURD, GALINDO & SMITH, L.L.P.
>
> 301 East Ocean Blvd. #1700
>
> Long Beach, CA 90802
>
> (562) 624-1177
>
> (562) 624-1178 fax
>
> (310) 993-6560 cellular
>
>
>
Margaret Norman, Attorney
111 N. Sepulveda Blvd. #355
Manhattan Beach, Ca. 90266
310-376-7873
Fax-310-798-9846
WWW:Margeslaw.com
Circular 230: To assure complaince with Treasury Dept regs., be
informed that any advice contained in this communication and/or
attachments was not written and cannot be used for the purpose of
avoiding any federal tax penalties that may be imposed on taxpayer.
The advice and/or suggestions may not be used in connection with
promoting, marketing, or recommending to any person any transaction or
matter mentioned herein. All opinions are for purposes of discussion
on this forum only.
This mail was scanned by BitDefender
For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

charset="US-ASCII"
I think this was discussed at last month's meeting. The issue is really
semantic, but makes a difference when you try to upload an order after the
hearing. Anything not entitled "Motion..for something" doesn't get a docket
entry in LOU. If you file an "Objection to Claim" and the court grants it,
when you go to upload your order, there is no corresponding event to tie the
order to, and you are in "Order Limbo", forever. It happened to me on a
couple of matters earlier this year. If you entitle most of your pleadings
"Motion .for something" you avoid the problem. I had this come up twice
with "applications" I filed to approve stipulations on reverse notice as
allowed by the Local Rules. After filing my declaration that no timely
opposition was received, I couldn't upload the LOU orders, because there was
no event to tie it to. Lou apparently only recognizes things called
"Motions".
-Jeffrey B. Smith
CURD, GALINDO & SMITH, L.L.P.
301 East Ocean Blvd. #1700
Long Beach, CA 90802
(562) 624-1177
(562) 624-1178 fax
(310) 993-6560 cellular
charset="US-ASCII"

The post was migrated from Yahoo.