Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

charset="windows-1251"
Toles said it for me. Nothing ever changes.
As for Keith's comments, Ken was merely airing his frustration and should
all be made aware of how Mr. Wolkowitz handles his files and treats debtors
and their counsel.
The only question is whether Mr. Schwartz' letter should also be forwarded
to the Office of the U.S. Trustee together with a petition signed by as many
listserve members as wish to sign it.
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
* Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
Specialization.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

The man has an air of arrogance unlike any trustee I have ever dealt with.
Kenneth Schwartz
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:51 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Trustee Wolkowitz and his Mishandling of Debtor Paperwork
Dear Ms. Riess,
Ms. Connoy's case was filed on January 21, 2009, and Mr. Wolkowitz was
assigned the
trustee. Upon filing the case, the Debtor's Social Security Number (B21
Form) was
uploaded. A copy of the Notice of Filing of the B21 Statement is attached.
On January 23,
2009, I personally transmitted a copy of Ms. Connoy's 2007 income tax return
to Mr.
Wolkowitz. A copy of the transmittal letter is attached hereto. Copies of
this transmittal
were also sent on January 23, 2009 to Paul Winkler, my appearance counsel.
Today was
Ms. Connoy's 341(a) examination. Mr. Wolkowitz refused to hear her case and
continued
it because (a) he claimed not to have received the Debtor's tax return; and
(b) he claimed
not to have been able to verify her Social Security Number from WEBPACER.
Appearance
counsel showed Mr. Wolkowitz my transmittal letter, but he refused to hear
the case.
I am informed that other cases, each with counsel, were continued as well,
because you
office claimed not to have received the tax returns. In each instance,
counsel showed Mr.
Wolkowitz their transmittal letters.
Obviously, there is a problem with your office and your method of handling
paper work
that is transmitted to you. That being said, there is no reason for Debtors
or their counsel
to be adversely affected.
Please advise this office how you plan to rectify this.
Thank you.
cc: Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys Association
Nina Connoy
Paul Winkler, Esq.
Les Fleming, Esq.
file
Yahoo! Groups Links

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I?do not believe that this is the proper use of this listserv.? I am curious as to what other members think.
Keith Higginbotham
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 2:50 pm
Subject: [cdcbaa] Trustee Wolkowitz and his Mishandling of Debtor Paperwork
Dear Ms. Riess,
Ms. Connoy's case was filed on January 21, 2009, and Mr. Wolkowitz was assigned the
trustee. Upon filing the case, the Debtor's Social Security Number (B21 Form) was
uploaded. A copy of the Notice of Filing of the B21 Statement is attached. On January 23,
2009, I personally transmitted a copy of Ms. Connoy's 2007 income tax return to Mr.
Wolkowitz. A copy of the transmittal letter is attached hereto. Copies of this transmittal
were also sent on January 23, 2009 to Paul Winkler, my appearance counsel. Today was
Ms. Connoy's 341(a) examination. Mr. Wolkowitz refused to hear her case and continued
it because (a) he claimed not to have received the Debtor's tax return; and (b) he claimed
not to have been able to verify her Social Security Number from WEBPACER. Appearance
counsel showed Mr. Wolkowitz my transmittal letter, but he refused to hear the case.
I am informed that other cases, each with counsel, were continued as well, because you
office claimed not to have received the tax returns. In each instance, counsel showed Mr.
Wolkowitz their transmittal letters.
Obviously, there is a problem with your office and your method of handling paper work
that is transmitted to you. That being said, there is no reason for Debtors or their counsel
to be adversely affected.
Please advise this office how you plan to rectify this.
Thank you.
cc: Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys Association
Nina Connoy
Paul Winkler, Esq.
Les Fleming, Esq.
file
I do not believe that this is the proper use of this listserv. I am curious as to what other members think.
Keith Higginbotham
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 2:50 pm
Subject: [cdcbaa] Trustee Wolkowitz and his Mishandling of Debtor Paperwork
Dear Ms. Riess,
Ms. Connoy's case was filed on January 21, 2009, and Mr. Wolkowitz was assigned the
trustee. Upon filing the case, the Debtor's Social Security Number (B21 Form) was
uploaded. A copy of the Notice of Filing of the B21 Statement is attached. On January 23,
2009, I personally transmitted a copy of Ms. Connoy's 2007 income tax return to Mr.
Wolkowitz. A copy of the transmittal letter is attached hereto. Copies of this transmittal
were also sent on January 23, 2009 to Paul Winkler, my appearance counsel. Today was
Ms. Connoy's 341(a) examination. Mr. Wolkowitz refused to hear her case and continued
it because (a) he claimed not to have received the Debtor's tax return; and (b) he claimed
not to have been able to verify her Social Security Number from WEBPACER. Appearance
counsel showed Mr. Wolkowitz my transmittal letter, but he refused to hear the case.
I am informed that other cases, each with counsel, were continued as well, because you
office claimed not to have received the tax returns. In each instance, counsel showed Mr.
Wolkowitz their transmittal letters.
Obviously, there is a problem with your office and your method of handling paper work
that is transmitted to you. That being said, there is no reason for Debtors or their counsel
to be adversely affected.
Please advise this office how you plan to rectify this.
Thank you.
cc: Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys Association
Nina Connoy
Paul Winkler, Esq.
Les Fleming, Esq.
file

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Dear Ms. Riess,
Ms. Connoy's case was filed on January 21, 2009, and Mr. Wolkowitz was assigned the
trustee. Upon filing the case, the Debtor's Social Security Number (B21 Form) was
uploaded. A copy of the Notice of Filing of the B21 Statement is attached. On January 23,
2009, I personally transmitted a copy of Ms. Connoy's 2007 income tax return to Mr.
Wolkowitz. A copy of the transmittal letter is attached hereto. Copies of this transmittal
were also sent on January 23, 2009 to Paul Winkler, my appearance counsel. Today was
Ms. Connoy's 341(a) examination. Mr. Wolkowitz refused to hear her case and continued
it because (a) he claimed not to have received the Debtor's tax return; and (b) he claimed
not to have been able to verify her Social Security Number from WEBPACER. Appearance
counsel showed Mr. Wolkowitz my transmittal letter, but he refused to hear the case.
I am informed that other cases, each with counsel, were continued as well, because you
office claimed not to have received the tax returns. In each instance, counsel showed Mr.
Wolkowitz their transmittal letters.
Obviously, there is a problem with your office and your method of handling paper work
that is transmitted to you. That being said, there is no reason for Debtors or their counsel
to be adversely affected.
Please advise this office how you plan to rectify this.
Thank you.
cc: Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys Association
Nina Connoy
Paul Winkler, Esq.
Les Fleming, Esq.
file

The post was migrated from Yahoo.