Stripping lien on non-principal residence
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
charset="US-ASCII"
I'm not a Chapter 13 guru at all, but I distinctly recall cases saying that
if you are stripping a lien to less than 100% unsecured, then you MUST pay
the remaining secured obligation in full over the life of the plan. It
seems to make sense. If you are modifying a $400K loan down to $300K over
the creditor's objection what are the payments over the remaining 25 years
(or whatever) of the "new" (remaining) loan based on? The $300K principal?
The $400k?
That's also why (I think) the new proposed legislation had to define what
the parameters of a re-write can be (i.e. 40 year amortized fixed at prime +
"risk"). The idea of stripping part of a loan and not paying it off within
the plan is foreign to Chapter 13, right now. Am I wrong?
-Jeffrey B. Smith
CURD, GALINDO & SMITH, L.L.P.
301 East Ocean Blvd. #1700
Long Beach, CA 90802
(562) 624-1177
(562) 624-1178 fax
(310) 993-6560 cellular
charset="US-ASCII"
The post was migrated from Yahoo.