9th Cir BAP Affirms CDCA decisions on the CH 13 Addendum
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:40 am
Great news! Ditto on the kudos to Nancy Clark and Tara Twomey!
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Erik Clark wrote:
>
> [Attachment(s) from Erik Clark included
> below]
>
> Attached is the 9th Circuit BAP's 43 page decision affirming the 4 lowers
> court's holdings that the CDCA's Ch 13 Addendum does not violate USBC
> 1322(b)(2) or RESPA.
>
> We will be putting out further information on this but the Addendum is
> alive and well (minus section A(7)) and everyone should be using it. It is
> the only protection you are giving your clients against the abuse being
> conducted in bankruptcy courts around the country. If anyone has any
> questions on why this addendum is important please call me directly.
>
> Kudos go to Nancy Clark and Tara Twomey of NACBA for their hard work on
> this important issue
>
>
> M. Erik Clark
> Borowitz, Lozano & Clark, LLP
> 100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
> West Covina, CA 91791
> www.BLClaw.com
> Office: (626) 332-8600
> Fax: (626) 332-8644
> Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
> American Board of Certification
>
>
Daniela P. Romero
Law Office of Daniela Romero, APLC
1015 N. Lake Ave., Ste. 115
Pasadena, CA 91104
Telephone:626-817-2611
Facsimile: 626-628-1781
email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein
is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the
addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing,
disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this
e-mail and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the
integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this
communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this
message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended
recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have
received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by e-mail
and immediately delete this message.
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal
tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot
be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal
Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
Great news! Ditto on the kudos to Nancy Clark and Tara Twomey!On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Erik Clark <eclark@blclaw.com> wrote:
[Attachment(s) from Erik Clark included below]
Attached is the 9th Circuit
The post was migrated from Yahoo.