Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

As an aside, it's been a while since there's been an increase in these fees.
Is it time to start lobbying for an increase, particularly given the number
of loanmod and Motions for Relief that now are issues that were not at time
of last increase?
ps: Bakersfield allows $5000 for self-employed, no-look..
Hale
_____

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Either or more commonly a combination of the two.
Mark T. Jessee
Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
"A Debt Relief Agency"
50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
(805) 497-5868
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT OF
THE TRANSMISSION, AND THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED TO BE
PRIVILEGED BY
LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE,
DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
PLEASE NOTIFY
US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS
MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
On Wed 20/01/10 7:30 AM , webblaw@earthlink.net sent:
Ok
When do we take the retainer?
Upfront or in the plan?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
FROM: "James T. King" DATE: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:05:38 -0800 TO:
SUBJECT: RE: [cdcbaa] CH 13 Retainer
The no look fee deal that was struck with the judges and
the bar is that the court will not require time sheets for cases where
the attorney agrees along with the client to abide by the terms of the
RARA and that the fee for services as detailed in the RARA will not
exceed $4000 for individual cases and $4500 for self employed debtors.
FROM: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] ON
BEHALF OF Larry Webb
SENT: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:20 PM
TO: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
SUBJECT: [cdcbaa] CH 13 Retainer
IMPORTANCE: Low
Here in the central district is it customary for the filing attorney
to receive the $4,500 RARA fee as the initial retainer?
Larry Webb
email Larry@Webbklaw.com
Law Office of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ave. Suite 43
Camarillo California 93010
805 987 1400
Fax 805 987 2866
WARNING And Tax disclaimer
This E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This information
is confidential information and is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. It is for the use of the named addressees and may
not be disclosed to anyone else without the express consent of the
originator. If you have received it in error you must not use,
disclose,copy, or rely on its contents and should destroy it
immediately. If you need any further information, please contact the
originator of this message.
IRS Circular 230 Disclaimer: To ensure compliance with IRS Circular
230, any U.S. federal tax advice provided in this communication is not
intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient
or any other taxpayer (i) for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties
that may be imposed on the recipient or any other taxpayer, or (ii) in
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party a partnership or
other entity, investment plan, arrangement or other transaction
addressed herein.
Links:
[1] mailto:?subjectRe: [cdcbaa] CH 13 Retainer
[2] mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com?subjectRe: [cdcbaa] CH 13 Retainer
[3]

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

The "no look" fee "deal" that was struck with the judges and the bar is that the court will not require time sheets for cases where the attorney agrees along with the client to abide by the terms of the RARA and that the fee for services as detailed in the RARA will not exceed $4000 for individual cases and $4500 for self employed debtors.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Here in the central district is it customary for the filing attorney to
receive the $4,500 RARA fee as the initial retainer?
Larry Webb
email Larry@Webbklaw.com
Law Office of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ave. Suite 43
Camarillo California 93010
805 987 1400
Fax 805 987 2866
WARNING And Tax disclaimer
This E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This information is
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. It is for the use of
the named addressees and may not be disclosed to anyone else without the
express consent of the originator. If you have received it in error you must
not use, disclose,copy, or rely on its contents and should destroy it
immediately. If you need any further information, please contact the
originator of this message.
IRS Circular 230 Disclaimer: To ensure compliance with IRS Circular 230, any
U.S. federal tax advice provided in this communication is not intended or
written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other
taxpayer (i) for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed
on the recipient or any other taxpayer, or (ii) in promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party a partnership or other entity, investment
plan, arrangement or other transaction addressed herein.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.