Page 1 of 1

Foreclosure Litigation

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:45 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Thanks Christine. Master servicer is gone - Washington Mutual Bank.ing rights of Washington Mutual Bank?
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2011 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Foreclosure Litigation
Catherine,
You definitely want to point out the break in the chain to support any modification negotiations.
Also, if you succeed in obtaining a major modification, then you need to be sure the Master Servicer is a party to that agreement, along with the trustee of the trust.
There is a HAMP Principle Reduction Allowance program that may benefit the parties here where the lender is compensated for entering into the agreement. [just a suggestion]
I hope this helps.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Catherine Christiansen wrote:
>
>Need some advice:
>
>
>1. POC filed (in Chapter 11) by US Bank, trustee, successor in interest to BofA by merger of LaSalle as trustee for WAMU 2007-HY6 series
>2. POC does not include necessary documents such as DOT & Note & proof of connection of creditor to originator
>3. POC accounting does not give credit for trial period payments (8/2009 - 1/2010 then loan mod denial)
>
>4. PSA does not list clients loan in the list of loan documents
>5. Recorded DOT lists Loan Link Financial as originator and no endorsements on DOT.
>
>6. Loan Link Financial who file for Ch 7 BK in Orange County and case was closed 5/19/11
>7. In Loan Link Financial BK relief was granted to National City Bank NA for all of the assets.
>
>8. Recorded Assign DOT by Deborah Brignac of MERS to BofA ,
>
>9. No other assignment recorded
>10. Deborah Brignac of Reconveyance Co signed the NTS on 1/41/11.>11. JP Morgan Chase representing they are servicer.
>
>
>
>In Federal District Court Case there is a Loan Modification Mediation scheduled - clients goal is loan modification, but now there are about 2 years of arrears, client has some savings but I think UPB is 115% above FMV so principal reduction is possible, my concerns are that if modification agreement actually happens without proof the loan is in the 2007-HY6 trust then is that a breach of my duty as attorney?
>
>Should I point out all of these irregularities in the documents to opposing counsel before the mediation?
>
>
>
>Thanks for your thoughts.
>
>
>Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
>
>
Christine A. Wilton
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
Lakewood, CA 90712
Office: 877-631-2220
Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078
Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web: www.attorneychristine.com
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments, is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Foreclosure Litigation

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:06 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Catherine,
You definitely want to point out the break in the chain to support any
modification negotiations.
Also, if you succeed in obtaining a major modification, then you need to be
sure the Master Servicer is a party to that agreement, along with the
trustee of the trust.
There is a HAMP Principle Reduction Allowance program that may benefit the
parties here where the lender is compensated for entering into the
agreement. [just a suggestion]
I hope this helps.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Catherine Christiansen wrote:
> **
>
>
> Need some advice:
>
> 1. POC filed (in Chapter 11) by US Bank, trustee, successor in interest
> to BofA by merger of LaSalle as trustee for WAMU 2007-HY6 series
> 2. POC does not include necessary documents such as DOT & Note & proof of
> connection of creditor to originator
> 3. POC accounting does not give credit for trial period payments (8/2009
> - 1/2010 then loan mod denial)
> 4. PSA does not list clients loan in the list of loan documents
> 5. Recorded DOT lists Loan Link Financial as originator and no
> endorsements on DOT.
> 6. Loan Link Financial who file for Ch 7 BK in Orange County and case was
> closed 5/19/11
> 7. In Loan Link Financial BK relief was granted to National City Bank NA
> for all of the assets.
> 8. Recorded Assign DOT by Deborah Brignac of MERS to BofA ,
> 9. No other assignment recorded
> 10. Deborah Brignac of Reconveyance Co signed the NTS on 1/41/11.
> (Signature not the same for Assign DOT & NTS).
> 11. JP Morgan Chase representing they are servicer.
>
> In Federal District Court Case there is a Loan Modification Mediation
> scheduled - clients goal is loan modification, but now there are about 2
> years of arrears, client has some savings but I think UPB is 115% above FMV
> so principal reduction is possible, my concerns are that if modification
> agreement actually happens without proof the loan is in the 2007-HY6 trust
> then is that a breach of my duty as attorney?
> Should I point out all of these irregularities in the documents to
> opposing counsel before the mediation?
>
> Thanks for your thoughts.
>
> Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
>
>
>
Christine A. Wilton
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
Lakewood, CA 90712
Office: 877-631-2220
Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078
Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web: www.attorneychristine.com
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
Catherine,You definitely want to point out the break in the chain to support any modification negotiations.Also, if you succeed in obtaining a major modification, then you need to be sure the Master Servicer is a party to that agreement, along with the trustee of the trust.
There is a HAMP Principle Reduction Allowance program that may benefit the parties here where the lender is compensated for entering into the agreement. [just a suggestion]I hope this helps.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Foreclosure Litigation

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:52 am
by Yahoo Bot

Need some advice:
1. POC filed (in Chapter 11) by US Bank, trustee, successor in interest to BofA by merger of LaSalle as trustee for WAMU 2007-HY6 series
2. POC does not include necessary documents such as DOT & Note & proof of connection of creditor to originator
3. POC accounting does not give credit for trial period payments (8/2009 - 1/2010 then loan mod denial)
4. PSA does not list clients loan in the list of loan documents
5. Recorded DOT lists Loan Link Financial as originator and no endorsements on DOT.
6. Loan Link Financial who file for Ch 7 BK in Orange County and case was closed 5/19/11
7. In Loan Link Financial BK relief was granted to National City Bank NA for all of the assets.
8. Recorded Assign DOT by Deborah Brignac of MERS to BofA ,
9. No other assignment recorded
10. Deborah Brignac of Reconveyance Co signed the NTS on 1/41/11. (Signature not the same for Assign DOT & NTS).
11. JP Morgan Chase representing they are servicer.
In Federal District Court Case there is a Loan Modification Mediation scheduled - clients goal is loan modification, but now there are about 2 years of arrears, client has some savings but I think UPB is 115% above FMV so principal reduction is possible, my concerns are that if modification agreement actually happens without proof the loan is in the 2007-HY6 trust then is that a breach of my duty as attorney?
Should I point out all of these irregularities in the documents to opposing counsel before the mediation?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen

The post was migrated from Yahoo.