Creditor offers Stip before Lam motion filed. Should Lam
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:26 am
I recently had the same issue and will be filing the stipulation
On Dec 16, 2011 3:12 PM, "Stella Havkin" wrote:
> **
>
>
> Just file the stipulation. ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Alik Segal
> *Sent:* Friday, December 16, 2011 2:41 PM
> *To:* CDCBAA Listserv; NACBA BK
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] Creditor offers Stip before Lam motion filed. Should
> Lam motion still be filed?****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Listmates,****
>
> ** **
>
> Chapter 13. At the time when I was preparing a Lam motion, the 2nd
> mortgage creditor emailed me with an offer to stipulate that 2nd mortgage
> is fully unsecured. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Do I still need to file a Lam motion or can I simply prepare the
> stipulation, have it signed and file it?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Alik Segal
> Alik.Segal@gmail.com
> 310-362-6157
> California Central District****
>
> ****
>
>
I recently had the same issue and will be filing the stipulation
On Dec 16, 2011 3:12 PM, "Stella Havkin" <havkinlaw@earthlink.net> wrote:
Just file the stipulation.
From: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alik Segal
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 2:41 PMTo: CDCBAA Listserv; NACBA BKSubject: [cdcbaa] Creditor offers Stip before Lam motion filed. Should Lam motion still be filed?
class"MsoNormal">Chapter 13. At the time when I was preparing a Lam motion, the 2nd mortgage creditor emailed me with an offer to stipulate that 2nd mortgage is fully unsecured.
Do I still need to file a Lam motion or can I simply prepare the stipulation, have it signed and file it?
-- Alik SegalAlik.Segal@gmail.com310-362-6157
California Central District
The post was migrated from Yahoo.