.jpg)
Serving copy of a motion, 4 pages on 1 page...economy or=
It is perfectly acceptable to serve creditors and parties in interest with a
copy reduced to 64% and use front and back so one page contains 4 reduced
pages.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, March 25, 2011 3:37:08 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Serving copy of a motion, 4 pages on 1 page...economy orlunacy?
Dear Listmates:
One of my client's received a proof of claim which used the "4 pages print to
one page" option in adobe.
Doubtless this saved some postage expense for the creditor. My question is, has
anyone ever sent out Motions (to strip, etc.) in this manner (by printing 2 or
even 4 pages to one page) to interested parties? Seems to me that it might give
the creditor grounds to fight service.
I would never DREAM of doing such a thing for judge's or Trustee's copy, but was
just wondering if anyone else had experienced this?
It is perfectly acceptable to serve creditors and parties in interest with a copy reduced to 64% and use front and back so one page contains 4 reduced pages. Law Office of Catherine ChristiansenFrom: Robert <robertvitt@vittlawfirm.com>To:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.comSent: Fri, March 25, 2011 3:37:08 PMSubject: [cdcbaa] Serving copy of a motion, 4 pages on 1 page...economy or lunacy?
Dear Listmates:
One of my client's received a proof of claim which used the "4 pages print to one page" option in adobe.
Doubtless this saved some postage expense for the creditor. My question is, has anyone ever sent out Motions (to strip, etc.) in this manner (by printing 2 or even 4 pages to one page) to interested parties? Seems to me that it might give the creditor grounds to fight service.
I would never DREAM of doing such a thing for judge's or Trustee's copy, but was just wondering if anyone else had experienced this?
The post was migrated from Yahoo.