Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Thanks for sharing. I thought some judges were already applying that theory.
WOW ! Should we take it to the next level...........avoiding junior TD in a 7.
If everyone did a 7 and obtained a discharge, then immediately filed a 13 (1 month plan to pay 100% since no unsecured debt - or maybe a phone bill).igibility requirements are met).
Very truly yours,Shai OvedThe Law Offices of Shai Oved7445 Topanga Cyn. Blvd., Suite 220Canoga Park, California 91303.comwww.shaioved.com________________The information contained in this email is intended only for the individual or entity named above and may contain attorney privileged and confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by the telephone number above and return any hard copies to us via the postal service.. The Law Offices of Shai Oved is a debt relief agency which helps people file for bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Code. Shai Oved isa Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialistby The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2019 7:34 am
Subject: [cdcbaa] New BAP Case
P, which held that when a debtor receives a discharge in a 7 and then files a 13 and successfully avoids a junior TD, that junior TD is not entitled to an unsecured claim.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.