Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Yes, it's been approved by the US Supreme Court. See attached.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jacob Chang wrote:
>
>
> PC received a ch. 7 discharge a year ago. It was originally filed as
> ch. 13, but was converted to ch. 7 because her unsecured nonpriority
> debt was over the eligibility limit. She wants to save her real
> property from being foreclosed. Is it possible to file a ch. 13 at
> this point, since she no longer has unsecured debts b/c of ch. 7
> discharge, and she is not seeking a discharge via ch. 13, just an
> orderly way to cure her default. Possible?
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Jacob D. Chang, Esq.
>
> Please kindly consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
> Note: This electronic mail is intended to be received and read only by
> certain individuals. It may contain information that is
> attorney-client privileged or protected from disclosure by law. If it
> has been misdirected, or if you suspect you have received this in
> error, please notify me by replying and then delete both the message
> and reply. Thank you.
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and
its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client
or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Yes, it's been approved by the US Supreme Court. See attached.On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jacob Chang <jacobchang.esq@gmail.com> wrote:
PC received a ch. 7 discharge a year ago. It was originally filed as
ch. 13, but was converted to ch. 7 because her unsecured nonpriority
debt was over the eligibility limit. She wants to save her real
property from being foreclosed. Is it possible to file a ch. 13 at
this point, since she no longer has unsecured debts b/c of ch. 7
discharge, and she is not seeking a discharge via ch. 13, just an
orderly way to cure her default. Possible?
Warm regards,
Jacob D. Chang, Esq.
Please kindly consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Note: This electronic mail is intended to be received and read only by
certain individuals. It may contain information that is
attorney-client privileged or protected from disclosure by law. If it
has been misdirected, or if you suspect you have received this in
error, please notify me by replying and then delete both the message
and reply. Thank you.
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
X-Attachment-Id: f_gnno3pdx0
name="USSC case allowing ch 20- Johnson v. Home State Bank.rtf"
filename="USSC case allowing ch 20- Johnson v. Home State Bank.rtf"
X-Attachment-Id: f_gnno3pdx0

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Sure. It's possible under your circumstances -- e.g., no discharge needed.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jacob Chang wrote:
>
>
> PC received a ch. 7 discharge a year ago. It was originally filed as
> ch. 13, but was converted to ch. 7 because her unsecured nonpriority
> debt was over the eligibility limit. She wants to save her real
> property from being foreclosed. Is it possible to file a ch. 13 at
> this point, since she no longer has unsecured debts b/c of ch. 7
> discharge, and she is not seeking a discharge via ch. 13, just an
> orderly way to cure her default. Possible?
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Jacob D. Chang, Esq.
>
> Please kindly consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
> Note: This electronic mail is intended to be received and read only by
> certain individuals. It may contain information that is
> attorney-client privileged or protected from disclosure by law. If it
> has been misdirected, or if you suspect you have received this in
> error, please notify me by replying and then delete both the message
> and reply. Thank you.
>
>
Giovanni Orantes, Esq.
Orantes Law Firm, P.C.
3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 389-4362
Fax: (877) 789-5776
e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
website: www.gobklaw.com
WE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
Sure. It's possible under your circumstances -- e.g., no discharge needed.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jacob Chang <jacobchang.esq@gmail.com> wrote:
PC received a ch. 7 discharge a year ago. It was originally filed asch. 13, but was converted to ch. 7 because her unsecured nonprioritydebt was over the eligibility limit. She wants to save her realproperty from being foreclosed. Is it possible to file a ch. 13 at
this point, since she no longer has unsecured debts b/c of ch. 7discharge, and she is not seeking a discharge via ch. 13, just anorderly way to cure her default. Possible?Warm regards,Jacob D. Chang, Esq.
Please kindly consider the environment before printing this e-mail.Note: This electronic mail is intended to be received and read only bycertain individuals. It may contain information that isattorney-client privileged or protected from disclosure by law. If it
has been misdirected, or if you suspect you have received this inerror, please notify me by replying and then delete both the messageand reply. Thank you.
-- Giovanni Orantes, Esq. Orantes Law Firm, P.C.3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 389-4362Fax: (877) 789-5776e-mail: go@gobklaw.comwebsite: www.gobklaw.comWE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.